are not also

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not also" is a valid phrase in written English.
It typically used in the negative form to emphasize that something is not the same, rather than both being the same. For example, "This product is not also certified organic, but it does adhere to safety regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Formal & Business

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

We are not 18 anymore".

The New York Times

Duration objects are not Music21Objects.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

"Remember, you are not 18".

The New York Times - Health

You are not 5.

Huffington Post

They are not 16 pretty young things.

Wikipedia

"But people are not 1000% confident".

Los Angeles Times

But there aren't 340 of them.

The Economist

There aren't 10 steps.

Huffington Post

I am not 37.

The New Yorker

We were not 4m apart.

The Guardian - Travel

But it is not 212.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are not also", ensure clarity by specifying what the subject is not, in addition to what it already isn't. This helps avoid ambiguity and provides a more complete understanding for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "are not also" in contexts where the negation becomes redundant or confusing. Ensure the sentence structure clearly conveys the intended exclusion without creating convoluted logic.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not also" functions as a negative correlative conjunction, indicating that something does not possess a quality or characteristic, in addition to not possessing another. Ludwig's analysis confirms its validity, though examples are limited.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are not also" serves to indicate a dual negation, emphasizing that something lacks multiple attributes or qualities. Although Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness, the phrase is rarely found in common usage. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity in your writing by explicitly stating what the subject lacks. Consider alternatives like "are not either" or "are neither" for simpler and more direct communication. Due to its limited frequency, careful and precise application is key.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

do not also

Changes the auxiliary verb from "are" to "do" to fit a different grammatical structure or tense.

is not also

Modifies the verb to "is" to accommodate singular subjects, altering the grammatical agreement.

are not in addition

Replaces "also" with "in addition" for a slightly more formal tone, emphasizing the additive nature of the exclusion.

are not furthermore

Substitutes "also" with "furthermore" for a more emphatic and formal connection, highlighting a successive point of difference.

are neither

Uses "neither" to indicate that something shares no characteristic with a previously mentioned item, providing a more direct negation.

are not either

Employs "either" to indicate a lack of shared qualities, often used at the end of a clause for emphasis.

are not even

Replaces "also" with "even" to emphasize surprise or unexpectedness in the exclusion, adding a layer of astonishment.

do not equally

Replaces "also" with "equally" to highlight the lack of equal characteristics, shifting the focus to equivalence.

are not jointly

Uses "jointly" instead of "also" to indicate a lack of shared participation or common action, shifting the focus to collaboration.

are not likewise

Substitutes "also" with "likewise" for a more formal comparison, emphasizing a parallel absence of characteristics.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "are not also" to sound more formal?

You could use alternatives such as "are not in addition", "are not furthermore", or "are not likewise" to convey a more sophisticated tone.

What's a simpler way to say "are not also"?

For a more straightforward expression, consider using "are not either" or "are neither", which are generally easier to understand in everyday conversation.

Is there a difference between using "are not also" and "do not also"?

Yes, the choice between "are not also" and "do not also" depends on the subject and verb tense. "Are not also" is used with plural subjects or forms of "to be", while "do not also" is used with other verbs in the present tense.

When is it best to use "are not also" in writing?

"Are not also" is best used when you want to emphasize that something lacks a characteristic in addition to lacking another, creating a sense of cumulative negation.