are not allowed to go

USAGE SUMMARY

The sentence "are not allowed to go" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that someone is prohibited from going somewhere. For example, "Children under the age of 10 are not allowed to go to the amusement park without an adult."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They are not allowed to go into debt.

Yale University

I told them: 'You are not allowed to go there.

The New York Times - Magazine

They are not allowed to go anywhere without supervision.

The New Yorker

Girls are not allowed to go to school.

The New York Times

They are not allowed to go anywhere unaccompanied.

The New York Times

We are not allowed to go and see him.

The Guardian

"They are not allowed to go to class," she said.

The New York Times

"If my people are not allowed to go to work, we will not disarm," he said.

The Economist

Women are not allowed to go to school and TV's, music and even kites are banned.

The New York Times

There can be no eating or bathroom breaks, and speakers are not allowed to go "off topic".

The New Yorker

"Our people are burying their dead in holes because they are not allowed to go to the cemetery.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "are not allowed to go", ensure that the context clearly indicates who is imposing the restriction and the specific location or situation being restricted. For example, "Students are not allowed to go to the library after 10 PM."

Common error

Avoid using incorrect verb tenses with "are not allowed to go". For instance, instead of saying "they was not allowed to go", use the correct form: "they were not allowed to go".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not allowed to go" functions as a verbal phrase expressing prohibition or restriction. It indicates that someone or something lacks permission or is forbidden from proceeding to a particular location or engaging in a specific activity. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Academia

7%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Science

6%

Wiki

6%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are not allowed to go" is a common and grammatically sound way to express prohibition or restriction. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for various contexts, ranging from news reports and academic papers to everyday conversations. While alternatives like "are prohibited from going" and "cannot go" exist, the choice depends on the desired level of formality and emphasis. When using this phrase, clarity regarding the source and scope of the restriction is crucial for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are prohibited from going

Emphasizes a formal prohibition.

are not permitted to go

Similar to "are allowed", but with a slightly more formal tone.

cannot go

A more direct and simple way of stating the inability to go.

are forbidden to go

Similar to "are prohibited", but can carry a stronger, more absolute sense of forbidding.

are prevented from going

Highlights the act of stopping someone from going, regardless of the reason.

are restricted from going

Indicates that there are limitations or constraints preventing someone from going.

are barred from going

Suggests a legal or official exclusion.

must not go

Expresses a strong obligation not to go.

don't have permission to go

Focuses on the lack of authorization.

are unable to go

Focuses on the inability to go, whether due to restrictions or other reasons.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "are not allowed to go"?

You can use alternatives such as "are prohibited from going", "cannot go", or "are forbidden to go", depending on the context.

Is it more formal to say "are not permitted to go" or "are not allowed to go"?

"Are not permitted to go" generally carries a slightly more formal tone than "are not allowed to go".

What's the difference between "are not allowed to go" and "are prevented from going"?

"Are not allowed to go" indicates a prohibition, while "are prevented from going" suggests that something is actively stopping someone from going, regardless of the reason.

Can "are not allowed to go" be used in legal contexts?

Yes, "are not allowed to go" can be used in legal contexts, especially when explaining restrictions or prohibitions imposed by law or regulations. However, more formal terms like "are prohibited from going" might be preferred.