are not again

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not again" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express a negation or a return to a previous state, but it lacks context to be usable. Example: "They are not again going to make the same mistake."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

The lawsuit says those states cannot ensure that the wolves are not again eradicated.

The New York Times

No amount of aid can solve Haiti's problems unless the appointed interim government of technocrats, led by Prime Minister Gérard Latortue, does its part competently and fairly, seeing to it that the impoverished slum dwellers who followed Mr. Aristide are not again ignored.

The New York Times

Primary care providers are not again accepting the promise of a little pill to solve a complex problem.

Huffington Post

Notably, other than a mention of acupuncture in a discussion of coverage issues, the individual complementary or integrative approaches or practitioners are not again noted.

Huffington Post

However, issues of new currency appear to have been limited under Eardwulf and significant numbers of Northumbrian coins are not again attested until the reign of Eardwulf's son Eanred.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

"My initial reaction was, not again," she said.

The New York Times

It is not, again, as if the government didn't have options.

The New Yorker

He is not again mentioned until the reign of Decius (emperor 249 251).

Encyclopedia Britannica

It was not again seriously threatened until the siege of Richmond and Petersburg (June 1864).

Encyclopedia Britannica

"I can understand how it would be, 'Not again,' or 'Here we go again,' " Torre said.

The New York Times - Sports

Looking at the diagonal entries of T, it is clear that negative of an eigenvalue is not again an eigenvalue.

Mathematical Sciences

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, replace the phrase "are not again" with more common and grammatically sound alternatives such as "will not happen again" or "will not be repeated" to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "are not again" in formal writing. While it might be understood in certain contexts, it can often lead to confusion. Opt for clearer alternatives to ensure your message is easily understood.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not again" functions as a negated adverbial modifier, aiming to express that an action or state will not be repeated. However, as Ludwig AI points out, this phrasing is not grammatically sound and can lead to ambiguity.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Wiki

25%

Science

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "are not again" appears in some contexts, it is considered grammatically incorrect and can lead to ambiguity. Ludwig AI advises that it's better to replace this phrase with clearer alternatives like "will not happen again" or "will not be repeated". It appears most frequently in news and media, but its informal nature means it should be avoided in formal writing. The scarcity of examples further suggests that more common and standard phrasing is preferable for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

will not happen again

Substitutes the phrase with a clearer and more common way of expressing that something will not be repeated.

will not be repeated

Replaces the phrase with a passive voice construction, emphasizing the action being avoided.

will not recur

Replaces "are not again" with a more formal and direct expression of non-reoccurrence.

is not recurring

Replaces the phrase indicating the absence of a repeating pattern.

is not going to reoccur

Substitutes the phrase with a more verbose version with the same core meaning of non-reoccurrence.

will cease to occur

Replaces "are not again" with a more formal expression to mean the end of occurence.

shall not re-emerge

Replaces with a more forceful way of stating something will not reappear or come back.

will never transpire

Substitutes with a stronger, more emphatic declaration that something will definitely not occur.

should not arise anew

Substitutes the phrase with a slightly more formal option, focusing on preventing a new occurrence.

will be a one-time occurrence

Replaces the phrase indicating a unique, unrepeated incident.

FAQs

Is "are not again" grammatically correct?

The phrase "are not again" is generally considered grammatically questionable. While it appears in some contexts, it's often clearer and more effective to use alternatives like /s/will+not+happen+again or /s/will+not+be+repeated.

What are some alternatives to "are not again"?

Depending on the context, you can replace "are not again" with phrases like /s/will+not+recur, /s/is+not+recurring or /s/will+cease+to+occur.

When is it appropriate to use "are not again"?

While technically questionable, "are not again" might be used in informal speech or writing where a slightly unconventional phrasing is acceptable. However, it's best avoided in formal contexts.

How can I ensure my writing is clear when trying to express that something won't repeat?

To avoid ambiguity, choose clearer alternatives such as "will not happen again" or "will not be repeated" instead of "are not again". Using such phrases will make your meaning more easily understood.