are nominated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are nominated with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to express that someone is nominated for an award or position, but the correct preposition should be "for." Example: "The candidates are nominated for the prestigious award each year."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

1. Readers recommend: Over to you Marconius: Quick calculation - if 1000 songs are nominated with an average length of 3 minutes each, it would take 3000 minutes or 50 hours to listen to them all.

The Guardian - Music

For each area, priority outcomes, outputs and activities are nominated, with indicators providing suitable measures.

Health Research Policy and Systems

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

At the 48th Annual Grammy Awards, The Game was nominated with a total of two nominations, including Grammy Award for Best Rap Song and Grammy Award for Best Rap Performance by a Duo or Group for the smash single "Hate It or Love It".

Wikipedia

"Win or lose it's just great and cool to be nominated with that group".

The New York Times - Arts

"To be nominated with the other finalists is one of the proudest moments of my life," said Conolan.

The Guardian

"She was so pleased to be nominated with him she sent him a beautiful gift basket – with a timer," Baldwin said.

The Guardian - Film

"It's a very surprising example of not dotting the i's and crossing the t's," said the producer Jimmy Jam, who was nominated with his partner, Terry Lewis.

The New York Times - Arts

REGIS PHILBIN was nominated with KATHIE LEE GIFFORD in the "outstanding talk show host category" at the Daytime Emmy Awards the other night.

The New York Times

Niether Mendes nor lead actor Daniel Craig were nominated, with only Adele's theme song – the Bond film's traditional strength – receiving a nod.

The Guardian - Film

Mr. Karlin was nominated, with various collaborators, for three other Oscars, for songs in the films "The Sterile Cuckoo" in 1969 and "The Little Ark" in 1972, and for the score to "The Baby Maker," in 1970.

The New York Times - Arts

Krone, the only woman to win a Triple Crown event when she rode Colonial Affair to victory in the 1993 Belmont Stakes, was nominated with her fellow jockeys Earlie Fires and the late Jack Westrope.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are nominated for" instead of "are nominated with" to express the correct grammatical structure when discussing nominations. For example, "The candidates "are nominated for" the award" is preferable.

Common error

Avoid using "with" after "nominated". The correct preposition is "for" when indicating what someone is being nominated to receive or achieve.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are nominated with" attempts to describe the act of being put forward for consideration alongside others. However, according to Ludwig AI, this construction is grammatically questionable. The correct preposition to use in this context is typically "for."

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Wiki

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are nominated with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. According to Ludwig AI, the correct preposition to use in most contexts is "for". While there are instances of "are nominated with" appearing in various sources, it's advisable to use "are "nominated for"" instead, especially in formal or professional writing. The alternative phrases “are considered alongside” or “are shortlisted with” may also work depending on the intended meaning. When aiming for clarity and correctness, prioritize "are "nominated for"".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are nominated for

Replaces 'with' with 'for', the correct preposition to indicate the purpose of the nomination.

receive a nomination with

Changes the verb to 'receive' and retains 'with' to specify what they are associated with.

are considered alongside

Emphasizes the act of being considered together rather than the nomination itself.

are shortlisted with

Implies being on a preliminary list with others.

are in contention with

Highlights the competitive aspect of being nominated.

are up for nomination with

Indicates eligibility for nomination alongside others.

are candidates along with

Presents the individuals as candidates being considered together.

compete with for nomination

Focuses on the act of competing for a nomination.

are chosen with

Highlights a selection process.

are selected alongside

Indicates selection in conjunction with others.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "nominated" in a sentence?

The correct preposition to use after "nominated" is typically "for", indicating the award, position, or honor someone is being considered for. For example: "She was "nominated for" best actress".

Is it grammatically correct to say "are nominated with"?

No, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The standard phrasing is "are "nominated for"" when referring to what someone is being nominated to receive.

What can I say instead of "are nominated with"?

You can use "are "nominated for"", "are considered alongside", or "are shortlisted with" depending on the intended meaning.

How does "are nominated for" differ from "are nominated with"?

"Are "nominated for"" is the grammatically correct way to indicate that someone is being considered for something. "Are nominated with" is generally incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing.