are no more

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are no more" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to mean that something or someone no longer exists, is gone, or is not the way they used to be. Example: The quaint little town has changed so much over the years, the old shops and buildings are no more.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

Those operations are no more.

The New York Times

Those days are no more.

The New Yorker

"There are no more secrets.

The New Yorker

There are no more paths.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

MPs are no more optimistic about unemployment.

Independent

There are no more imports.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

He is no more.

The New York Times

That team is no more.

The New York Times - Sports

Others were no more loyal.

The Economist

It was no more than Costa Rica deserved.

BBC

Wars were no more.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are no more" to emphasize a sense of finality or a significant change in circumstances. For example, "The old traditions are no more, replaced by modern customs."

Common error

Avoid using "are no more" when a simple "are not" suffices. Overusing the phrase can make your writing sound overly dramatic or unnatural when a more straightforward expression is appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are no more" functions as a declarative statement indicating the cessation of existence or the end of a particular state. As Ludwig AI suggests, it is a grammatically correct way to say something no longer exists. The examples show its wide applicability across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

79%

Academia

11%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Science & Research

2%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are no more" is a grammatically correct and common way to express that something no longer exists, is gone, or isn't the way it used to be. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and general applicability. It appears most frequently in news and media, with academic and business contexts also showing notable usage. While versatile, overusing the phrase can sound unnatural, so consider using synonyms like "no longer exist" or "are gone" for simpler statements. The key is to understand the context and use "are no more" when emphasizing finality or significant change.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no longer exist

Replaces the phrase with a more direct synonym, focusing on the cessation of existence.

are gone

A simpler, more direct way to say something is absent or has disappeared.

have ceased to be

A more formal way of expressing that something no longer exists.

no longer present

Focuses on the absence of something from a particular place or situation.

have disappeared

Suggests a complete vanishing or removal.

do not remain

Indicates that something has been taken away or has deteriorated to the point of non-existence.

have vanished

Implies a sudden or mysterious disappearance.

are extinct

Used for things that have died out completely and permanently.

are defunct

Used to describe something that is no longer functional or operational.

have been eradicated

Suggests a forceful or deliberate removal or destruction.

FAQs

How can I use "are no more" in a sentence?

The phrase "are no more" indicates that something no longer exists or is the case. For instance, you could say, "The days of free internet /s/are+gone" or "The restrictions that once constrained us /s/have+been+lifted."

What is a synonym for "are no more"?

Synonyms include phrases like "no longer exist", "have ceased to be", or simply "are gone", depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "are no more"?

Yes, "are no more" is grammatically correct. It's used to describe the absence or non-existence of something.

What's the difference between "are no more" and "are not"?

"Are no more" often implies a sense of finality or a significant change, suggesting something once present is now absent. While "are not" is a simple negation, "are no more" conveys a stronger sense of cessation.