Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "are necessary for future" is not correct as it is missing a noun after "future" to clarify what is necessary.
You can use it in contexts where you want to express that something is essential for future outcomes, but it needs to be completed for clarity.
Example: "These skills are necessary for future success in your career."
Alternatives: "are essential for the future" or "are required for future endeavors."
Exact(13)
Experiments investigating the sensitivity to grid size and subgrid-scale parameterization are necessary for future model validation.
In Section 2, we briefly introduce some concepts and fundamental results, which are necessary for future discussion.
This device assures high conversion efficiency and low debris flux which are necessary for future extreme ultraviolet lithography.
Accurate estimations of the health risks to astronauts due to space radiation exposure are necessary for future lunar and Mars missions.
The quantified uncertainties are necessary for future uncertainty and sensitivity study of TRACE code in nuclear reactor system design and safety analysis.
These equations are necessary for future work on numerical simulation of deposit profiles on realistic engineering parts having complex curved surfaces.
Similar(47)
Although the United States court did not order that a new standard be developed, the majority on the Florida court made it clear it today that it believed that a new, more explicit standard was necessary for future elections.
A much faster monitoring scheme may be necessary for future optical packet-switching networks.
It is necessary for future studies to conduct further research on CEOs who can influence the whole organization.
Known as Prospector-X, the small spacecraft will test key technologies in Low Earth Orbit that will be necessary for future asteroid prospecting.
Therefore, it is necessary for future research to consider adverse consequences for the reliability and validity of any construct, caused by poor test-theoretical practices.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com