The phrase "are necessary for explaining" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the importance of certain elements or factors in providing a clear explanation of a topic.
Example: "The background information and context are necessary for explaining the complex theories presented in the research."
Alternatives: "are essential for clarifying" or "are crucial for elucidating".
Litzow, M. A., Mueter, F. J. & Hobday, A. J. Reassessing regime shifts in the North Pacific: incremental climate change and commercial fishing are necessary for explaining decadal-scale biological variability.
Her response demonstrated that some key concepts were not specific to natural selection; in fact, key concepts such as variability and change of population are necessary for explaining evolutionary change by stochastic processes (e.g., genetic drift) as well as deterministic processes (e.g., natural selection).
As for point (iii) above, matter is a metaphysical constituent of things and is necessary for explaining change, receptivity of accidents, and individuation.
We suggest that viscoelastic relaxation is necessary for explaining the observed postseismic deformation by constructing the only afterslip model and fitting the observation data.
"Our efforts are focusing on building on what we have, adding extra dimensions (both new physical space and an organizational framework that will provide coordinating mechanisms and collaborative opportunities), and understanding and establishing the supports that are necessary for commercialization outcomes," Costello explains.
As a result, proteins involved in maintaining the concentration of cellular iron ions are necessary for the invasion stage, which explains the identification of hmx1 in network at this stage.
SAMS has also been linked to the biosynthesis of polyamines that are necessary for cell growth and division, possibly explaining the increased accumulation of SAMS during early fruit development when cell division reaches its maximum.
Altogether, these observations suggest that more than FOXP3 is necessary for fully explaining the regulatory phenotype.
The reasoning that more than FOXP3 is necessary for fully explaining the regulatory phenotype in humans is supported by several observations.
The importance of programming and documentation standards for the software is explained, as both are necessary for a well-designed and well-documented automation system.
In this study we attempt to explain what conditions are necessary for triggering the relapsing-remitting autoimmune response in MS and why in most cases it is not a chronic-progressive process from the beginning.
