The phrase "are much less generous" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to compare the generosity of two or more subjects, indicating that one is significantly less generous than the other(s).
Example: "While some donors are very giving, others are much less generous in their contributions."
Alternatives: "are significantly less charitable" or "are considerably less giving."
Some are much less generous.
In fact some are much less generous.
(Toyota, by contrast, is almost entirely free of these burdens, at least in the U.S., because its workers are much younger and their benefits are much less generous).
In contrast, (lower) income countries are much less generous with values of around 6 (e.g. Georgia) to 20 (e.g. China) with some outliers.
While the U.S. provides some support through the Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit for low-income families, these programs are much less generous than those in our peer countries, and leave out the lowest income families.
For everyone now under 55, he wants to turn Medicare into a voucher program that's much less generous than the program is scheduled to be.
But it has been much less generous with handing out citizenship, at least to those who can claim no German blood.
The danger is that the austerity conditions remain fully in force and debt relief is much less generous than Tsipras is hoping for.
Kemp Hannon, a Long Island Republican who is chairman of the Health Committee in the New York State Senate, said he expected Medicare drug benefits to be much less generous than those provided by the state program.
Despite this, it remains a money-purchase arrangement and is much less generous than the final-salary scheme, says John Ralfe, a pensions consultant.The accelerating demise of final-salary schemes provided by companies contrasts with their rude health in the public sector.
Having got much of what it wanted in today's vote, the White House seeks to use the House bill as leverage in the Senate, where moderates have insisted on a smaller, $350 billion tax cut over 10 years, which is much less generous to investors than the House version.
