The phrase "are more robust when" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a condition or situation in which something becomes stronger or more effective under certain circumstances.
Example: "The results of the experiment indicate that the solutions are more robust when subjected to higher temperatures."
Alternatives: "are stronger when" or "are more resilient when".
We found that (1) longer term averages of litter are more robust when compared to measurements and modeled estimates, and (2) the appearance of "hot spots" of elevated litter fall corresponding to undersampled areas of the complex terrain disappeared when the field measurements were supplemented with ANPP.
Medians and quartiles have been adopted in preference to means and standard deviation as the former are more robust when the data are not normally distributed.
Results are more robust when cells are exposed to a single selection.
Tumor growth and angiogenesis are more robust when tumor cells are co-implanted with orthotopic tissue versus other tissues, or in the skin alone.
Estimates of genetic diversity are more robust when marker data is used and particularly so when pedigree records are poor or shallow.
Otherwise, Figures 5 and 6 show that methods based on MA (CHI-S, LOGIT, and GAUSSIAN) are more robust when faced with the exon length problem.
This approach is more robust when few or no source counts are within the region.
The simulation results show that the designed IWLSSVR-based soft sensor is more robust when the measured data have some impurities.
This selectivity was more robust when larger numbers of surrounding items and multiple features were included in the display, and it was absent when only a few items were presented immediately outside the CRF.
The pervasiveness of IT requires more organizations to describe the role and effects of IT during their industry and competitor analysis (ICA), which is more robust when the most technically literate professionals in the company are involved.
"Research suggests that the 20% productivity gap between typical American and British firms is because US managers tend to be more robust when it comes down to HR issues," says Richard Wilson, head of business policy at the Institute of Directors.
