Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "are more repeatable than" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the consistency or reliability of two or more items, processes, or results.
Example: "The new testing method and the old one were compared, and the results showed that the new method are more repeatable than the previous one."
Alternatives: "are more consistent than" or "exhibit greater repeatability than".
Exact(1)
5) Generally, larger standard deviations were found for the screw back-out cases, implying that the results of full insertion cases are more repeatable than those of the back-out cases.
Similar(59)
Specifically, we use meta-analysis to ask whether different types of behaviours were more repeatable than others, and if repeatability estimates depended on taxa, sex, age, field versus laboratory, the number of measures and the interval between measures.
From these two plots it appears that the lower altitude (bottom panel) has less variability between replicates (i.e. is more repeatable) than the higher altitude (top panel).
20 Quantitative measures appear to be more repeatable than echocardiographic assessments; and CMR measures appear robust when subjected to flow phantom validation.
Previous work carried out has shown that fluorogenic 5' exonuclease ("TaqMan®") probe chemistry was more repeatable than Scorpion probe or SYBR® Green I chemistries for genetically modified soya amplification on the LightCycler® (Roche Diagnostics, Lewes, UK) and the ABI PRISM® 7700 (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) [ 13].
We find that both approaches reach the same conclusion; lower altitudes are more repeatable.
However, from the plots taken together for both models we can draw a clear conclusion; lower flights are more repeatable.
The identification of AVP from long axis views was more repeatable and reproducible than from short axis views.
BUT is also considered a top choice in clinical testing, as it also measures the mechanisms discussed above with good overall accuracy, 14 and appears to be more repeatable across patient visits than many other diagnostic tests.
In terms of the experimental measurements, the semiautomatic method was more repeatable and reproducible, and less time-consuming and fastidious than the manual method.
W2 works tends to be more repeatable.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com