The phrase "are more likely to implement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the probability or tendency of a subject to carry out a specific action or plan.
Example: "Companies that prioritize employee training are more likely to implement innovative solutions."
Alternatives: "tend to adopt" or "are more prone to execute".
In researching the experience of alumni, we've learned that participants who attend with a colleague are more likely to implement design thinking practices in their classrooms and schools.
Another important result is that countries undertaking fiscal consolidation measures are more likely to implement labour market reforms.
Men, on average, are more likely to implement stricter repercussions for behavior and have more individualistic decision-making.
Based on the results, farmers are more likely to implement soil conservation measures as adaptation strategy on parts of their agricultural land that are more susceptible (steep slopes) to climate change risks.
People are more likely to implement risk-reduction strategies before an event or evacuate during an event if they comprehend that past events have impacted their communities, if they believe that future events could do so again and that viable mitigation options exist, and if they themselves have been involved in determining their community's risk-reduction strategies (Mileti [1999]).
Great attention has been paid to the analysis of the timing of reforms over the business cycle (e.g. whether governments are more likely to implement reforms during economic crises) as well as to the role played by other institutional and economic factors (e.g. fixed exchange rate) (Turrini et al. 2015; Duval 2008).
Localities with larger increases have been more likely to implement them in several steps.
If QE and looser short-term fiscal policies boost demand, growth, and employment, governments may be more likely to implement politically painful structural reforms and long-term fiscal consolidation.
Based on its initial research, the Effective Philanthropy Learning Initiative EPLII) at Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society (PACS) hypothesized that high net worth donors will learn faster and be more likely to implement an impactful philanthropy strategy if provided with a centralized, user-friendly platform of tools and resources.
