Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
The phrase "are more likely to contain functional" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the probability of certain items or elements having a functional aspect or purpose.
Example: "Studies show that older software versions are more likely to contain functional bugs that affect performance."
Alternatives: "tend to include functional" or "are more prone to having functional".
Exact(1)
In this case, it is difficult to confidently conclude that 5' promoter regions are more likely to contain functional alleles that regulate opsin expression, although the data are suggestive.
Similar(59)
We established odds ratios of functional annotations that are more likely to contain significantly trait-associated SNPs, for the purpose of prioritizing GWAS hits for further studies.
What kinds of documents are more likely to contain opinions and claims?
Higher priced rosé wines are more likely to contain added SO2 than lower priced rosé wines.
Buildings constructed before 1980 are more likely to contain the potentially deadly material, explained Reinstein.
Certain fruits are more likely to contain chemicals than others.
are more likely to contain vivid or lucid dreams.
> -wrap-foot> Variants occurring in evolutionary conserved regions are more likely to carry functional significance.
Larger urban areas were more likely to contain both coyotes and human-coyote conflicts, and were also more likely to have greater numbers of conflicts.
One way to improve accuracy in motif discovery is to rely on positional priors to focus the search to parts of a sequence that are considered more likely to contain functional binding sites.
Positional priors can be used as an aid in motif discovery by assigning high prior values to regions that we consider more likely to contain functional binding sites and then focus the search on these regions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com