Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are more intangible
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are more intangible" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the level of intangibility of two or more subjects or concepts. Example: "The benefits of emotional intelligence are more intangible than those of technical skills."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
Others are more intangible.
News & Media
Now I have a three-year-old daughter, Robin, and there are more intangible worries when I'm dressing her up for a party.
News & Media
"The perks in the Ivy League are more intangible than they are material," said Tom Beckett, the athletic director at Yale. "The perks and salaries at these other big schools, that's not going to happen.
News & Media
However, the conflicts in PSO design areas are more intangible and harder to formulate.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
It's more intangible".
News & Media
The reason zoos do it is more intangible, including reputation and public draw.
News & Media
Scott said he thought the team's problems were more intangible than strategic or fundamental.
News & Media
What we do has an impact in the real world, but the benefit to the consumer is more intangible.
News & Media
He had always wanted the office and relished the challenge which was more intangible and philosophic than the problems of industry.
News & Media
Other researchers have set out to quantify the one-child policy's more intangible effects on Chinese society.
Science & Research
Here's how.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When comparing two concepts, use "are more intangible" to highlight that one is abstract and lacks concrete attributes compared to the other. For instance: "The benefits of brand reputation are more intangible than direct sales figures."
Common error
Avoid using "are more intangible" in technical or scientific writing where specific measurements or data are expected. Instead, opt for terms like "less quantifiable" or "difficult to measure" to maintain clarity.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are more intangible" primarily functions as a comparative descriptor. It modifies a noun by indicating that it possesses a higher degree of intangibility compared to something else. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Science
33%
Formal & Business
17%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "are more intangible" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression for denoting qualities that are abstract, difficult to measure, or lack concrete attributes. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and broad applicability. It's commonly found in news and media, as well as scientific contexts, highlighting its suitability for both general and specialized communication. While versatile, it’s best used when precision isn't paramount, and alternatives like "are less concrete" or "are more abstract" might be more appropriate in technical contexts. Its frequent use in authoritative sources underscores its reliability and clarity in conveying abstract concepts.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are less tangible
Directly contrasts with tangibility, focusing on the non-physical nature.
are less concrete
Focuses on the lack of physical or material presence.
are more abstract
Highlights the conceptual nature rather than tangible reality.
are harder to define
Emphasizes the difficulty in establishing clear boundaries or meanings.
are less measurable
Indicates the challenge in quantifying or assessing the attributes.
are not easily quantified
Highlights the challenge in assigning numerical value.
are more subtle
Suggests a quality that is delicate or nuanced and not immediately obvious.
are more elusive
Implies difficulty in capturing or understanding the essence.
are largely conceptual
Highlights the reliance on ideas and mental constructs.
are difficult to grasp
Emphasizes the cognitive effort required to understand.
FAQs
How can I use "are more intangible" in a sentence?
Use "are more intangible" when you want to express that something is difficult to define or measure precisely. For example: "The long-term effects of the policy are more intangible than the immediate financial costs."
What can I say instead of "are more intangible"?
You can use alternatives like "are less concrete", "are more abstract", or "are harder to define" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "are more intangible" or "are less tangible"?
Both phrases are grammatically correct, but they convey opposite meanings. "Are more intangible" suggests something is abstract and difficult to grasp, while "are less tangible" suggests something has fewer physical properties or is less concrete.
What's the difference between "are more intangible" and "are more abstract"?
"Are more intangible" emphasizes the difficulty of measuring or defining something precisely, while "are more abstract" highlights that something exists primarily as a concept or idea, rather than a physical entity.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested