are monitored

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are monitored" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the act of observing or keeping track of something, often in a context related to surveillance or oversight. Example: "In our organization, employee activities are monitored to ensure compliance with company policies."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Their friendships are monitored.

The New York Times - Sports

Mosques are monitored.

The New York Times

Phone calls are monitored.

The New York Times

Their phone calls are monitored.

The Guardian

The teachers are monitored too.

The Economist

Their economies are monitored separately.

The New York Times

He assumes his calls are monitored.

The Guardian

Ideally, they are monitored within the network.

The Guardian - Sport

Internet cafes are monitored; television is censored.

The New York Times

"Of course, the calls are monitored".

The New York Times

Water usage and supplies are monitored.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are monitored", ensure the context clearly indicates who or what is doing the monitoring. This adds clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "are monitored" without specifying the actor. Unclear passive voice can obscure accountability. Always indicate who is doing the monitoring to maintain transparency and avoid confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are monitored" functions as a passive verb phrase. It indicates that the subject is receiving the action of being watched or tracked. Ludwig shows numerous examples where various entities, from phone calls to economies, are the recipients of this action.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are monitored" is a very common and grammatically correct passive verb phrase used to indicate that a subject is under surveillance or observation. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. The phrase appears most frequently in news and media, as well as scientific contexts, carrying a neutral tone. When employing "are monitored", it's crucial to specify the actor to avoid ambiguity and maintain clarity. Alternatives like "are supervised" or "are observed" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are supervised

Emphasizes oversight and control, suggesting a more direct level of management.

are observed

Highlights the act of watching and noticing, potentially without intervention.

are tracked

Implies following the progress or movement of something over time.

are watched

Suggests vigilance and attention, often for security or safety purposes.

are overseen

Indicates responsibility for managing and directing something.

are inspected

Focuses on careful examination for quality or compliance.

are audited

Refers to a systematic review, often of financial records.

are scrutinized

Implies close and critical examination, often with suspicion.

are kept under surveillance

Emphasizes continuous and covert observation.

are under observation

Focuses on a state of being watched, often in a medical or scientific context.

FAQs

How can I use "are monitored" in a sentence?

You can use "are monitored" to describe a process or situation where something or someone is being watched or tracked, such as "Patient vitals are monitored closely after surgery".

What's the difference between "are monitored" and "are supervised"?

"Are monitored" implies observation, while "are supervised" suggests oversight and direction. Supervision involves actively guiding and managing, while monitoring is primarily observational.

What can I say instead of "are monitored" to sound more formal?

In a more formal context, you could use "are overseen" or "are subject to surveillance" instead of "are monitored".

Is it always necessary to specify who is monitoring when using "are monitored"?

While not always grammatically required, specifying who is monitoring provides clarity and avoids ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "The data is monitored", it's better to say "The data is monitored by the security team".