Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "are missing large" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe something that is significantly absent or lacking, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear.
Example: "The reports are missing large sections of data, making it difficult to draw conclusions."
Alternatives: "are lacking significant" or "are missing substantial".
Exact(5)
Most states are missing large swathes of map data, and the data that's there is not completely accurate.
"People are missing large opportunities," says.
While I'd prefer all my content in one place on each of these devices – an overarching umbrella ebook app, perhaps – having a bit of overlap is always fun and some stores – Apple's for example – are missing large parts of the catalog due to rights reasons.
Ten of the 70 protein-coding genes display internal stop codons (most often TAA), five require frameshifts for proper translation, five are missing large conserved segments universally found in plastid genes, and two display an extremely divergent sequence compared to their known homologs available in Genbank (Table 2, Fig. S1).
Some other mitochondrial species, including all the mammalian tRNASer acceptors, are missing large portions of the D-arm that appear necessary to the structural integrity of the tertiary core.
Similar(55)
Some were missing large chunks of flesh.
But there were no roads in this inaccessible area -- and vaccinators were missing large numbers of children.
As for Mr. Knohl's reading of the "Self-Glorification Hymn," Mr. Collins said: "We're missing large parts the hymn.
In January, they spotted two chicks (one of which is pictured above) in the Hope Bay Adélie penguin colony that were missing large patches of feathers.
Years ago I visited my son's classroom to ask for a plan that would smooth the path for my son, who at the time was missing large chunks of time to debilitating migraines.
The C. jejuni GenBank draft genome CG8486 appeared to be missing large sections of the genome and was excluded from the core genome size estimation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com