are manually reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are manually reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a process where something is examined or evaluated by a person rather than automatically or by a machine. Example: "All submitted applications are manually reviewed to ensure quality and accuracy before approval."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

Flagged contributions are manually reviewed by a team of lawyers, then cleared or refunded.

The Washington Post

"Anyone can flag a video and these videos are manually reviewed 24/7 and any videos that don't belong in the app are removed.

The Guardian - Tech

A 2016 internal Facebook document seen by the Guardian, called "Fake, Not Real Person", said that each week the company receives over 6.5m reports of potentially fake accounts and that 3.7m are manually reviewed.

The Guardian

Bots are manually reviewed ahead of inclusion.

TechCrunch

These flagged videos are manually reviewed 24/7 and any that shouldn't be included are removed within hours.

TechCrunch

Flagged videos are manually reviewed 24/7 and any videos that don't belong in the app are removed".

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

Currently, most of the companies that are backing transactions, aside from Forter, are companies that are manually reviewing them.

TechCrunch

All journal articles, together with both highly cited and recent conference papers were selected, giving a total of 536 peer-reviewed publications (22%) to be manually reviewed.

Crime Science

ABOSOLUTE solutions were manually reviewed and selected purity/ploidy solutions.

Nature

Low coverage samples (<0.05×) and low tumor fraction samples were manually reviewed for tumor fraction estimation.

Nature

"The refusal to review approximately 9,000 additional Miami-Dade ballots, which the counting machine registered as nonvotes and which have never been manually reviewed".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are manually reviewed" when you want to emphasize that a human being, not a machine or algorithm, is responsible for the review process. This is especially useful when discussing quality control, sensitive content, or processes requiring nuanced judgment.

Common error

While "are manually reviewed" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound less direct. Consider rephrasing to active voice where appropriate, such as "reviewers manually review" to create a more engaging sentence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are manually reviewed" functions as a passive verb phrase. It indicates that the subject is receiving the action of being reviewed, and this action is performed manually. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

66%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are manually reviewed" is a grammatically correct passive verb phrase indicating a human, rather than automated, review process. While Ludwig AI confirms its validity, remember to consider active voice alternatives for a more direct writing style. It appears more frequently in scientific and news contexts. For alternatives, consider options like "are checked by hand" or "are examined manually". Ensure clarity by using the phrase when you want to clearly communicate human involvement in an evaluation process.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are examined manually

Replaces "reviewed" with "examined", highlighting a more detailed inspection.

are human-reviewed

Concise adjectival form emphasizing human involvement in the review.

are checked by hand

Emphasizes the physical act of checking, rather than a formal review process.

are personally verified

Highlights the aspect of verification by a person.

are physically reviewed

Highlights the tangible aspect of reviewing, emphasizing that it's done by a real person.

are assessed by a person

Focuses on the human element of the assessment process.

are evaluated by a human

Similar to assessed by a person, but using evaluated to convey a formal process.

are individually inspected

Stresses the separate inspection of each item.

undergo manual inspection

Changes the structure to emphasize the process of inspection.

are scrutinized by hand

Emphasizes thoroughness and critical examination.

FAQs

What does "are manually reviewed" mean?

It means that a person, not a computer or automated system, examines and assesses something. This often implies a more thorough or nuanced evaluation.

When should I use "are manually reviewed" instead of "are automatically reviewed"?

Use "are manually reviewed" when a human performs the review. Use "are automatically reviewed" when a computer or algorithm performs the review. The choice depends on who or what is doing the reviewing.

What can I say instead of "are manually reviewed"?

You can use alternatives like "are checked by hand", "are examined manually", or "are assessed by a person" depending on the specific context.

Is it redundant to say something "is manually reviewed" if the context already implies human involvement?

It can be redundant, yes. Consider whether the "manually" adds necessary clarity. If the context already makes it clear that a person is reviewing something, you can simply say it "is reviewed".