Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "are looking at was" is not correct and usable in written English.
It appears to be a grammatical error, as it combines present continuous ("are looking at") with past tense ("was") in a way that does not make sense.
Example: "They are looking at what was once a thriving business."
Alternatives: "are examining what was" or "are considering what was".
Exact(2)
Authenticity come from knowing that what you are looking at was mechanically and deterministically derived from a set of ledgers and that those ledgers are available for inspection.
"Part of the area we are looking at was actually above sea level during the last ice age," he said. .
Similar(58)
"What you are looking at is not called democracy.
Now all they are looking at is power".
"All we are looking at is the next seven weeks.
"One of the years they are looking at is 1998.
Now what is the probability that the creature you are looking at is poisonous?
And therefore what we are looking at is providing him or her with a package.
Among the issues regulators are looking at is: When is a token a security versus a commodity?
What you are looking at is known as a Dual Purpose Improved Conventional Munition, or DPICM.
What they are looking at is the football club and what it stands for.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com