The phrase "are likely to be valid" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the probability or expectation that something is true or accurate.
Example: "The results of the experiment are likely to be valid, given the rigorous methodology employed."
Alternatives: "are expected to be valid" or "are probably valid".
Since the instrument set includes the randomly allocated exposure to the intervention and the earthquake indicator, both of which are likely to be valid, we interpret this as evidence in support of the validity of all the instruments.
These principles are likely to be valid for research and extension approaches for similar integrated natural resource management (INRM).
Similar thermodynamic schemes are likely to be valid for other ATP-driven transporters, e.g. P-type ATPase importers (Bublitz et al., 2011) or energy-coupling factor (ECF) importers (Xu et al., 2013).
One way of addressing this problem is to remind yourself that, although your supervisor and other experts may know more about the research area, you are looking in more detail at your project and so your ideas are likely to be valid, Dell says.
Instruments must be uncorrelated with the disturbance term, which includes unobserved endowments: The reduced-form demand relations indicate the potential set of instruments, but not all of the right side variables in those relations are likely to be valid instruments in the sense of being uncorrelated with the disturbance terms in relations (1v) and (1n).
The conclusions raised here are likely to be valid for other eukaryotic phyla.
It predicts when the octet rule is likely to be valid and when hypervalence can be anticipated, and the occurrence of multiple bonds and the presence of lone pairs of electrons correlate with the chemical properties of a wide variety of species.
Moreover, though the minister will let employers increase a worker's overtime from 130 hours a year to as many as 180, his decree is likely to be valid only for 18 months.Another answer, of course, is to play for time.
The present results combined with recently published results for various wetted porous dielectrics indicate that, despite the complexity of this class of matter, such as heterogeneity of composition and micro-structural landscape and their disordered environment, a compensation rule between the absolute value of the activation volume and enthalpy is likely to be valid.
Thus, the fairness can be guaranteed if the puzzle solving times of different machines do not differ by a factor of two. Figure 8 implies that this condition is likely to be valid in a real environment since the performance of the CPUs used in recent desktop and laptop computers is usually not much different from that of the three types of CPUs considered in this article.
