Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are less substantial for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are less substantial for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is not as significant or important in relation to a particular subject or context. Example: "The arguments presented in the debate are less substantial for those who have already made up their minds."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(19)
are less interesting for
are less valuable for
are less useful for
are less informative for
are of limited use for
are not as helpful for
are inadequate for
are impractical for
are inappropriate for
are insufficient for
are deficient in
are not capable of
fall short of
are unsuitable for
are unfit for
are appropriate for
prove inadequate for
are not suitable for
are unfeasible for
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
These advances have also led to improved outcomes for those with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, such as t(4 14), when compared with conventional therapeutic approaches, although these improvements are less substantial for high-risk than for lower-risk patients.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
For example, the increase in income and social status that typically accompanies advanced educational attainment may be less substantial for nonwhites than whites, particularly among women [ 8].
Science
The two Vivaldi serenatas on Robert King's set for Hyperion are less substantial and considerably less interesting than L'Olimpiade, and never performed with the same energy and intensity that Alessandrini and his singers bring to the opera.
News & Media
Of the desired 2m filings, many will be for "utility" or "design" patents, which are less substantial than "invention" patents.
News & Media
Diagenetic contributions of lead are less substantial in cortical bone.
Interviews with Junior's surviving sons are less substantial but viscerally charged.
News & Media
And any reimbursements can be less substantial than for in-person treatment.
News & Media
The increase in model χ for classification 5T (383) was less substantial.
Science
Although FAD exposure had some significant effects on T and Vtg in males, the impacts were less substantial and trends were less clear than those observed for females.
But this dismissive attitude is as misleading as it would be for us to believe that invisible clear air is less substantial that the clouds floating in it.
News & Media
The Making of King Arthur was less substantial than other parts of the Norman history strand the BBC has been running for the last few weeks.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "are less substantial for", ensure you clearly define both elements being compared to avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify which aspect is "less substantial" and for whom or what it is less substantial.
Common error
Avoid using "are less substantial for" without providing context. Readers might misunderstand the scope of the comparison. Provide specific details or examples to clarify what the subject is "less substantial" than.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are less substantial for" serves as a comparative connector, indicating that something has a diminished effect or importance in relation to a specific subject or context. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness.
Frequent in
Science
33%
News & Media
33%
Formal & Business
33%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "are less substantial for" is a grammatically correct and commonly used comparative expression. As Ludwig AI states, it effectively indicates a diminished effect or significance within a specific context. It finds frequent use across diverse fields like Science, News & Media, and Formal & Business settings. While versatile, ensuring clarity by specifying the comparative elements is crucial. Related alternatives, such as "are not as important for" or "have a reduced impact on", can provide nuanced options for expression. When employing "are less substantial for", remember to contextualize the comparison for effective communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are not as important for
Emphasizes the reduced importance, using a simpler structure.
are of diminished significance for
Uses more formal vocabulary to convey reduced importance.
carry less weight for
Employs a metaphorical expression to indicate reduced influence.
have a reduced impact on
Focuses on the effect being smaller in a specific case.
are not as influential for
Highlights the decreased level of influence in relation to something.
are less meaningful for
Indicates a lower level of relevance or personal significance.
are of lesser consequence for
Uses formal language to express reduced importance of the consequence.
hold less value for
Highlights the diminished worth or importance attached to something.
are less pertinent for
Indicates a lower degree of relevance or direct connection.
matter less to
Simplifies the expression to indicate something is of reduced concern.
FAQs
How can I use "are less substantial for" in a sentence?
Use "are less substantial for" to compare the relative significance or impact of something across different contexts or groups. For example: "The benefits of the policy are less substantial for small businesses than for large corporations."
What's a more formal alternative to "are less substantial for"?
A more formal alternative could be "are of diminished significance for", which conveys a similar meaning with more elevated vocabulary.
When is it appropriate to use "are less substantial for"?
It's appropriate when comparing the impact, importance, or value of something, showing that it has a weaker effect or holds less significance in one case compared to another. Ensure the comparison is clear.
What phrases are similar in meaning to "are less substantial for"?
Similar phrases include "are not as important for", "carry less weight for", or "have a reduced impact on", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested