The phrase "are less efficient in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to compare the efficiency of different methods, processes, or entities in a specific context.
Example: "The new software updates indicate that older systems are less efficient in processing large datasets."
Alternatives: "are not as effective in" or "are inferior in efficiency at".
(2) ESPs are less efficient in eliminating smaller particles, and the lowest efficiency rates are 91.9 and 93.4 % for particles with diameters of approximately 1 micron.
ESPs are less efficient in eliminating smaller particles, and the lowest efficiency rates are 91.9 and 93.4 % for particles with diameters of approximately 1 micron.
Current fast aligners such as Bowtie (Langmead et al., 2009) and BWA (Li and Durbin, 2009) can efficiently map reads to the exon region, but are less efficient in the mapping of reads across splice junctions.
As described above, disassembly of the outer capsid proteins and subsequent escape into the cytoplasm efficiently proceed in reovirus-susceptible tumor cells, whereas these steps are less efficient in reovirus-refractory tumor cells.
And, he said, he and his colleagues have found that women's muscles are less efficient in storing and using glycogen, a carbohydrate that is the main fuel used in distance events.
And that is just what is starting to happen, with the deployment of free-standing underwater turbines.The big disadvantage of free-standing turbines is that they are less efficient in transforming the mechanical energy of water into electrical energy than turbines in dams are.
In part this is thanks to recovery from the economic crisis; in part it is down to the longer-term shift in economic activity towards emerging economies, which are less efficient in their energy use.Robust growth was seen in all regions and in almost all types of energy use: the world consumed more of every main fuel bar one than it had in any previous year.
These methods are less efficient in the case of nonlinearly separable data (Chien et al. 2010).
Managed LULC such as crops and grasses are less efficient in extracting soil moisture (Keese et al. 2005).
From the presented analysis, we can conclude that the distributed algorithms are less efficient in frequency assignment compared to their centralized counterparts.
Obviously, since the simple schemes can be understood as adding constraints to the most general case, they are less efficient in terms of attainable rates.
