The phrase "are intended to answer" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when explaining the purpose or goal of something, particularly in contexts like questions, surveys, or research.
Example: "The following questions are intended to answer the key issues we face in our project."
Alternatives: "are meant to address" or "are designed to respond to".
Sometimes, as in Jubilees and in the Pseudo-Philo work, these accretions are intended to answer the questions of heretics, but often, particularly in the case of Josephus, they are apologetic in presenting biblical heroes in a guise that would appeal to a Hellenized audience.
The proceedings, which will take place before elections officials, are intended to answer a question: Did Mr. Emanuel, who lived in Washington while he worked at the White House until October, maintain legal residency in Chicago, a city that requires candidates for mayor to be residents for at least a year before an election?
It processes natural language (i.e. "who was the first president of the United States?") and returns images that are intended to "answer" your query.
Some of the major questions that this questionnaire was intended to answer were: 1. Are physicians and patients knowledgeable regarding the importance of vitamin D and calcium in the management of osteoporosis?
The tax was intended to answer populist rage at the growing divide between the rich and the poor.
A second Taliban representative, also reached by telephone, said the attack was intended to answer American and Afghan proposals to "reconcile" with and "reintegrate" Taliban fighters into mainstream society.
Mr. McCain's article was intended to answer an Op-Ed column by Mr. Putin in The New York Times on Sept. 12 that made the case against President Obama's threatened military strike on Syria.
The case, she said, was intended to "answer a fundamental legal question about the powers that can be used by the prime minister and whether they can side-step parliament".
It's the white paper on independence, a document that is intended to answer all the outstanding questions about how Scotland would become independent, and what the new nation would be like, if Scots vote to leave the United Kingdom in the referendum on 18 September next year.
A 60-page report to members of Congress was intended to answer concerns from lawmakers who say the department has kept them in the dark about its counterterrorism operations and has not done enough to safeguard civil liberties in its pursuit of terrorists.
