are included to

USAGE SUMMARY

'are included to' is not a grammatically correct phrase.
You can use the phrase 'are included in' when referring to something that is part of a larger group or set. For example, "Apples, oranges, and pears are included in the fruit basket."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They are included to highlight the inanity of Guzman's choice, an indiscretion exasperated by Jiménez's equalizer.

The Guardian - Sport

Examples are included to illustrate the theory.

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Two simple schemes are included to explain these results.

Combustion and Flame

Many numerical examples are included to validate the current approach.

Journal of Computational Physics

Several representative applications are included to evaluate the method.

Journal of Computational Physics

Numerical results are included to illustrate the theoretical predictions.

Journal of Computational Physics

Numerical examples are included to illustrate the proposed method.

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

Two examples are included to illustrate the approach.

Materials Science and Engineering: A

Three examples are included to demonstrate the suggested method.

Materials & Design

Examples are included to illustrate the method presented.

Computers & Electrical Engineering

Examples are included to demonstrate the advantages of the procedure.

Computer Aided Chemical Engineering

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating that items form part of a larger set, use "are included in" or a similar construction to ensure grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "are included to" when your intention is to state a purpose. The correct phrasing is typically "are included in order to" or rewriting the sentence for clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are included to" attempts to function as a purpose connector, suggesting that certain elements are added or present to achieve a specific goal. However, this construction deviates from standard English grammar. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is not grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

61%

News & Media

37%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are included to" is frequently encountered, particularly in scientific and news contexts, yet it's flagged as grammatically incorrect by Ludwig AI. The intended meaning is often to convey purpose or to indicate that certain elements are part of a larger set. A more grammatically sound alternative is "are included in" when indicating membership within a group, or rephrasing the sentence to use constructions like "are meant to" or "are intended to" to express purpose. While the phrase is common, adhering to standard grammar practices enhances clarity and precision in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are included in order to

Adds the explicit purpose for inclusion, emphasizing intention.

are integrated into

Highlights how the items become a functioning part of a whole.

are incorporated for

Highlights the functional integration of the included items.

are designed to be included

Implies that they are built to be present in another element.

are meant for inclusion in

Implies that they are expected to be present in another element.

are added to

Focuses on the action of supplementing something with additional items.

are there in order to

Highlights the reason for the presence.

serve to include

highlights the elements that have the function to include other elements.

are present in

Emphasizes the existence or presence of items within a context.

are featured within

Indicates that the items are given prominence or attention.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say something is part of a group?

The correct way to indicate that something is part of a group is to use the phrase "are included in". For example, "Apples, bananas and oranges are included in the fruit basket".

Is "are included to" grammatically correct?

No, "are included to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. While it may appear in some contexts, it's advisable to use a more standard phrasing like "are included in".

What can I use instead of "are included to" to indicate purpose?

To express purpose, you can use phrases like "are included in order to" or rewrite the sentence to use "are meant to" or "are intended to".

How can I avoid errors when using phrases about inclusion?

Always double-check your phrasing to ensure it accurately conveys your intended meaning. If you are referring to something belonging to a set, "are included in" is usually correct. If you're expressing purpose, use "in order to" or rephrase for clarity.