Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

are identified using

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are identified using" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the method or process by which something is recognized or determined. Example: "The species of the plant are identified using a combination of morphological and genetic analysis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Individual EBRs are identified using linear programming.

The off-granite locations are identified using red symbols.

These components are identified using a block-based (DCT) transform.

In general, vehicle models are identified using texture descriptors.

Oligomeric species are identified using electrospray mass spectrometry.

Science

Polymer

Potential features for classification are identified using a facial model.

RSNs are identified using the spatial independent component analysis (ICA) of GIFT toolbox.4.4

These peaks are identified using the first derivative of d(i).

Under the snowball-sampling technique, initial subjects with desired characteristics are identified using purposeful-sampling technique.

Local maxima (with respect to frequency) are identified using both the first and second derivative tests.

Specific interatomic contacts between ligand and protein heavy atoms are identified using the LPC program [60].

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are identified using", ensure the method described is clear and directly relevant to the subject. For example, "Species are identified using DNA sequencing" is more informative than a vague statement.

Common error

While "are identified using" is grammatically correct, overuse of the passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Consider rewriting the sentence in the active voice for a more direct and engaging style. For example, instead of "The samples are identified using the spectrometer", try "Researchers use the spectrometer to identify the samples".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are identified using" functions as a passive construction used to describe the method by which something is recognized or classified. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is usable in written English and is commonly found in scientific literature to indicate the tools or processes utilized.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

98%

News & Media

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are identified using" is a grammatically correct and very common construction, particularly within scientific and technical writing, as affirmed by Ludwig AI. It serves to clearly articulate the method by which something is recognized or classified. While effective, writers should be mindful of potential overuse of the passive voice. Alternatives such as "are detected via" or "are determined through" can offer stylistic variety. The phrase's primary contexts are heavily skewed towards science, reflecting its utility in explaining methodologies and processes. When using the phrase, clarity and relevance of the described method are key to effective communication.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "are identified using" to sound more active?

Consider using active voice constructions such as "...identifies...", "...detects...", or "...determines...". For instance, instead of saying "The bacteria are identified using a microscope", you could say "A microscope identifies the bacteria".

What are some formal alternatives to "are identified using"?

In formal writing, you might use phrases like "are ascertained via", "are determined through", or "are classified according to". These alternatives, while similar in meaning, often lend a more sophisticated tone.

Is it ever incorrect to use "are identified using"?

While grammatically correct, "are identified using" can be verbose. In cases where the method is obvious or implied, it may be omitted for conciseness. For example, instead of "Symptoms are identified using observation", simply stating "Symptoms are observed" might suffice.

What is the difference between "are identified using" and "are recognized by"?

"Are identified using" generally refers to a specific method or tool used for identification, while "are recognized by" implies a more general understanding or familiarity. For example, "Chemical compounds are identified using mass spectrometry", but "Friends are recognized by their voices".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: