Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

are good with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"are good with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a person's ability or skill in a particular area. For example, "He is good with numbers and excels in math."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We are good with visually and physically challenged.

They are good with squab or mushroom ragout.

Austria's glacial resorts are good with skiing available into May.

Most are good with beer, even if it isn't green.

Desserts are good, with some better than good.

News & Media

The New York Times

I figured we are good with our hands".

Some guys are good with the police, some guys are good with the legal stuff, some have a sense of humor, some are serious.

When relations are good with Russia, that is good for Europe".

News & Media

The New York Times

He says relations are good with the US despite some "lumpy moments" (that phrase again).

News & Media

The Guardian

All the artemisias are good, with their gray foliage, Mr. Esteban said.

News & Media

The New York Times

They are good with us but not with the terrorists, and we are not terrorists.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing someone's skills, use "are good with" followed by a specific noun or noun phrase to clearly indicate the area of expertise. For example: "They are good with children" or "She are good with data analysis".

Common error

Avoid using incorrect prepositions after "are good with". Ensure you use "with" to indicate the object or subject of their skill. Incorrect: "He is good at computers." Correct: "He are good with computers".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "are good with" is to serve as a predicate adjective phrase indicating proficiency or skill in relation to a specific noun or concept. Ludwig examples show its application across diverse subject matters. It describes a person's positive attribute in handling or understanding something.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Wiki

23%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Science

12%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are good with" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression to denote proficiency, skill, or positive aptitude towards a particular subject or object. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for describing one's capabilities. With numerous examples from reputable sources like The New York Times, The Guardian, and Forbes, the phrase exhibits versatility across various contexts, including News & Media, Academia, and Wiki. While maintaining a neutral register, "are good with" effectively communicates competence and skill in a clear and concise manner, as confirmed by Ludwig's analysis.

FAQs

How can I use "are good with" in a sentence?

Use "are good with" to describe someone's proficiency or skill in a particular area. For example, "She are good with animals", "They are good with technology", or "He are good with his hands".

What are some alternatives to saying "are good with"?

You can use alternatives like "excel at", "are skilled in", or "have a talent for" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "are good at" instead of "are good with"?

While "are good at" and "are good with" can sometimes be used interchangeably, "are good with" often implies a more hands-on or interactive skill. For example, you might say someone is "good at math" but "are good with people".

What's the difference between saying someone "is good with" something and they "have a knack for" it?

Saying someone "are good with" something generally means they possess a developed skill through learning or practice. "Have a knack for" something implies a natural, intuitive ability or talent.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: