are good for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are good for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the benefits or usefulness of something in a specific context. Example: "These vitamins are good for boosting your immune system."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Utilities are good for trading.

The New Yorker

These are good for what?

The New York Times

Rivalries are good for the game.

The New York Times - Magazine

SUMMITS are good for Angela Merkel.

The Economist

Another thing men are good for.

The New Yorker

HIGH prices are good for farmers.

The Economist

Low prices are good for consumers.

The Economist

Leftovers are good for a few days.

The New York Times

— Solitary skills are good for mental health.

Independent

Martinis are good for the soul.

The New York Times

Tickets are good for both days.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are good for", ensure you clearly state what benefits or advantages something provides in a specific context. For example, "These exercises are good for improving cardiovascular health."

Common error

Avoid stating that something "are good for" without specifying the benefit or purpose. Be specific and provide context to ensure clarity. For instance, instead of saying "Apples are good for you", specify "Apples are good for providing essential vitamins and fiber."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are good for" functions as a predicative adjective describing the beneficial qualities or suitability of a subject. It expresses a positive attribute concerning the subject's effect or purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Wiki

33%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Science

10%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are good for" is a versatile and commonly used expression to indicate the benefits or suitability of something. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically sound and finds frequent application across diverse contexts, particularly in News & Media, Wiki, and Academia. It functions as a predicative adjective, serving to inform and persuade about the positive attributes or purposes of a subject. When employing this phrase, clarity and specificity are key; vaguely stating that something "are good for" without specifying the benefit can reduce its impact. Alternatives like "are beneficial for" and "are advantageous to" can add nuance depending on the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are beneficial for

Emphasizes the advantageous nature or positive impact.

are advantageous to

Highlights the favorable conditions or benefits provided.

are well-suited to

Indicates a strong match or compatibility for a specific purpose.

are appropriate for

Suggests suitability and relevance in a given situation.

are effective for

Focuses on the successful or desired outcome achieved.

are helpful for

Highlights the supportive or assisting nature.

are conducive to

Emphasizes that it leads to or promotes a certain result.

are instrumental in

Indicates a crucial role in achieving a specific outcome.

contribute to

Shows how something adds to or helps in a larger effort.

are designed for

Specifies the intended use or purpose.

FAQs

What can I say instead of "are good for"?

You can use alternatives like "are beneficial for", "are advantageous to", or "are well-suited to" depending on the context.

How to use "are good for" in a sentence?

Use "are good for" to describe the benefits or suitability of something. For example, "Fruits and vegetables are good for maintaining a healthy diet".

What's the difference between "are good for" and "benefit from"?

"Are good for" describes the inherent positive qualities of something, while "benefit from" indicates that someone or something receives advantages from something else. For example, "These supplements are good for your health" versus "You can benefit from taking these supplements".

Is it correct to say "is good for" instead of "are good for"?

No, "is good for" is used with singular nouns or uncountable nouns, while "are good for" is used with plural nouns. For example, "This exercise is good for your muscles" versus "These exercises are good for your muscles".