The phrase "are free to exploit" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where individuals or groups are given permission or the opportunity to take advantage of a resource or situation.
Example: "As a member of the open-source community, you are free to exploit the software for your own projects."
Alternatives: "are allowed to utilize" or "have the liberty to take advantage of".
This latter axiom of faith states that those who have obtained property are free to exploit it as they desire, with no obligation to others.
Where the lifting of the "dead hand of politicians and bureaucrats" means the private sector runs schools and multinationals are free to exploit the country.
The problem is that this law isn't being enforced, so employers are free to exploit graduates who can afford to work for less than the minimum wage – and exclude those who can't.
Another issue to be aware of is that well-resourced competitors are scouring these sites, and are free to exploit the technology or concept you just shared with the world.
It means drug dealers and people who commit domestic and sexual violence are free to exploit a voiceless class of victims; such criminals become a threat to us all.
The right of the individual to be free from oppression and exploitation has become the right of the individual to be free to exploit and oppress others.
Under the Act, society is free to exploit facts, ideas, processes, or methods of operation in a copyrighted work.
An American-based industry like Major League Baseball should be free to exploit Latino children as it would any natural resource.
Lonn Trost, the Yankees' general counsel, said: "He was quite explicit in saying the Yankees were free to exploit their rights as they saw fit and we were free to launch our own network.
If Broad were to succeed in obtaining the kind of programming control of MOCA that Govan denied him at BCAM, then he would be free to exploit his influence over a public institution for his personal benefit.
Without Nike's presence, says Norberg, domestic employers (both public and private) would be free to exploit workers.
