are expected for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are expected for" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct form would be "are expected to" or "are expected from." Example: "The results are expected to be announced next week."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

About 12 people are expected for supper.

The New York Times - Magazine

Operations are expected for at least eight months.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

No decisions are expected for months to come.

The New York Times

Crowded, vigorous races are expected for each of those seats.

The New York Times

No other new projects are expected for a while.

The New York Times

Thus, no renormalizations are expected for the 2ZO mode2ZO

Nature

Differences are expected for at least two reasons.

Nature

Similar gains are expected for the Regal with eAssist.

The New York Times

Unimpressive crowds are expected for their series with the Yankees.

The New York Times - Sports

Moreover, important solvent losses are expected for the absorption unit.

Chemical Engineering Science

No impact/outages are expected for servers or services during this maintenance effort.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "are expected to" or "are expected from" instead of "are expected for" to maintain grammatical correctness. For example, say "Results are expected to be released soon".

Common error

Avoid using "for" after "expected" when indicating a future action. The correct construction is "expected to" followed by a verb. Using "for" creates a grammatically incorrect sentence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are expected for" functions as a passive construction attempting to express anticipation or prediction. However, according to Ludwig AI, it's grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "are expected to" followed by a verb.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

44%

Academia

18%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While the phrase "are expected for" appears frequently across diverse sources, including news, science, and academia, Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "are expected to." Despite its common usage, writers should prioritize grammatical accuracy and use "are expected to" or alternative phrases like "are anticipated for" or "are projected for." This ensures clarity and credibility in writing, especially in formal contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are anticipated for

Replaces "expected" with "anticipated", implying a slightly more formal expectation.

are projected for

Substitutes "expected" with "projected", often used for forecasts or estimations.

are predicted for

Uses "predicted" instead of "expected", suggesting a more calculated or scientific forecast.

are foreseen for

Replaces "expected" with "foreseen", giving a sense of anticipation based on current circumstances.

are scheduled for

Indicates that something has been officially planned to happen.

are planned for

Similar to 'scheduled for', but can be slightly less formal.

are intended for

Focuses on the purpose or aim rather than a direct expectation.

are designed for

Highlights the intended function or use of something.

are designated for

Emphasizes that something has been specifically assigned or allocated.

are earmarked for

Indicates that resources or funds have been specifically set aside for a particular purpose.

FAQs

How to correct "are expected for" in a sentence?

Replace "are expected for" with "are expected to" followed by a verb, or use an alternative phrase like "are anticipated for" or "are projected for" depending on the intended meaning.

What can I say instead of "are expected for"?

You can use alternatives such as "are anticipated to", "are projected to", or "are scheduled for" based on the context.

Which is correct, "are expected for" or "are expected to"?

"Are expected to" is the grammatically correct phrase. "Are expected for" is considered incorrect in standard written English. For example, "The results are expected to be announced next week" is correct.

What's the difference between "are expected for" and "are intended for"?

"Are intended for" indicates a planned purpose or function, while "are expected for" (though grammatically incorrect) attempts to convey an anticipation of something happening. It's better to use "are expected to" instead.