are evidence of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are evidence of" is correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is proof or support for a particular thing. For example, "The remains found in the cave are evidence of early human habitation in this region."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

My grandchildren are evidence of that.

The New York Times

The Comedy Awards are evidence of this.

The New York Times - Arts

"They are evidence of deep character flaws.

The New York Times

Voting anomalies are evidence of voter fraud.

The New York Times

They are evidence of peerlessly tacky taste.

The New Yorker

They are evidence of the creative life you have lived.

The Guardian - Arts

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

I'm evidence of that.

The New York Times

There is evidence of what is possible.

The New York Times

— to being evidence of a police conspiracy.

The New Yorker

Hopkins repugnant tweet is evidence of that.

Independent

There is evidence of this effect.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer this phrasing in formal writing where you need to make a logical argument based on presented data or facts.

Common error

Avoid using "are evidence of" when the connection between the evidence and the claim is weak or speculative. Instead, use softer phrases like "may suggest" or "could indicate" to avoid overstating your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are evidence of" functions as a linking phrase connecting plural subjects to a condition, quality, or event that they substantiate. This indicates a relationship where the subjects provide proof or support for a particular claim, as seen in Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are evidence of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate that certain elements serve as proof or support for a particular claim. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness for written English. Predominantly found in neutral registers like News & Media, Science, and Encyclopedias, its function is to link subjects with their implications or causes. When employing this phrase, ensure a strong logical connection between your subjects and the claim, avoiding overstatements. Alternatives like "are indicative of" may offer nuanced options. Remember to use "is evidence of" for singular nouns.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are indicative of

Stresses the function of being a sign or symptom.

constitute proof of

Emphasizes the role of direct proof or validation.

confirm the existence of

Focuses on validating the reality or presence of something.

demonstrate the existence of

Highlights the act of showing or revealing something's presence.

attest to the fact that

Formally confirms something's reality or truth.

substantiate the claim that

Provides support or evidence to back up an assertion.

indicate the presence of

Focuses on suggesting or pointing towards something's existence, without necessarily proving it.

bear witness to

Implies a strong confirmation or validation of something.

serve as an indication of

Highlights the suggestive function of something, implying a clue or sign.

lend credence to

Adds believability or support to an idea or statement.

FAQs

How can I use "are evidence of" in a sentence?

Use "are evidence of" to link plural subjects to a condition, quality, or event that they substantiate. For example, "The artifacts discovered are evidence of a thriving civilization".

What phrases can I use instead of "are evidence of"?

Alternatives include "are indicative of", "demonstrate the existence of", or "constitute proof of", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "is evidence of" instead of "are evidence of"?

No, "is evidence of" is used with singular subjects, while "are evidence of" is used with plural subjects. For example, "This document is evidence of the agreement", versus "These documents are evidence of the agreement".

What's the difference between "are evidence of" and "suggest"?

"Are evidence of" implies a stronger connection of proof, whereas "suggest" indicates a possibility or likelihood. "These results are evidence of a new phenomenon" conveys more certainty than "These results suggest a new phenomenon".