The phrase "are entitled to assert" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing rights or privileges that allow someone to make a claim or statement.
Example: "As a shareholder, you are entitled to assert your opinions during the annual meeting."
Alternatives: "have the right to claim" or "are permitted to state".
Under this mechanism, private individuals are entitled to assert before a national court that their Member State has breached an EU law provision that has conferred on them rights.
But he is confident that we are entitled to assert the existence of some sort of reality underlying the appearance of both minds and bodies, so that epistemological idealism must be accompanied by some sort of ontology, even if only an indeterminate one.
The question of whether it should be is, for now, secondary to the practical reality that the secretary of state is entitled to assert her will.
But just as Sir Nick is entitled to warn that nuclear deterrents are there to deter (clue in name, etc), not to be fired, so Corbyn is entitled to assert the important principle of civilian control over the military.
The Bush administration quickly put these hearings into place after the Supreme Court ruled in June that the Guantánamo detainees were entitled to assert in federal court that they had been imprisoned without fair hearings.
Such direct claim shall not be subject to any reduction by way of setoff, cross-claim, or counterclaim which the estate of such railroad in reorganization may be entitled to assert against the Corporation, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, the Association, or the United States.
According to The Washington Post, supporters of the Maryland bill, which would impose fines of up to $50, assert that children are entitled to protection from secondhand smoke in vehicles because they cannot avoid exposure.
As guardians of their son's child, they have asserted that they are entitled to oversee the renovation.
"Employees are entitled to benefits in place during their employment," asserts the California Public Employees Retirement Systemm in a recent report.
Harold Jeffreys, F.R.S., noted geologist and astronomer, and author of a well-regarded philosophy of science book Scientific Inference (1957), led off with a nice ad hominem: "Without using induction, Milne and Eddington could not order their lives for a day, and what they are really asserting is that they are entitled to use special axioms in physics, for which no need has been shown".
They assert that the top executives of the organization, as regulators, are entitled to absolute immunity from lawsuits.
