Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "are deep enough to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a depth that meets a certain requirement or standard in various contexts, such as physical measurements or metaphorical meanings.
Example: "The pool's waters are deep enough to accommodate divers of all skill levels."
Alternatives: "are sufficiently deep to" or "are adequately deep to".
Exact(30)
Some of the footprints are deep enough to cast shadows.
Its ties with the kingdom are deep enough to withstand this upset.
The Yankees are deep enough to have Burnett as their third starter, a luxury their rivals must envy.
The Yankees are deep enough to summon Grimsley from the bullpen and have him pitch five sturdy innings.
The depths of all the grooves are deep enough to prevent the tip from contacting the groove bottom land.
Mr Stournaras hopes they are deep enough to achieve a primary budget surplus (before making debt repayments) of 1.4% of GDP.
Similar(30)
Right now, it's deep enough to hide a rabbit.
The shelves were deep enough to hold multiple trays.
"His pockets were deep enough to bring the players in".
The ball he had just hit was deep enough to be a homer, that was certain.
"This team is deep enough to win games," Jason Kidd said after Thursday's game.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com