Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "are constantly more" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express an increasing frequency or intensity of something, but it lacks proper grammatical structure.
Example: "They are constantly more engaged in their work than ever before."
Alternatives: "are increasingly" or "are continually more".
Exact(3)
"Some of them are really good so its great to provide them to our existing customers". The try-before-you-buy model isn't new but for gadgets, there's more room to grow since there are constantly more options and they're more expensive.
SLSs found in natural genomes are constantly more numerous and stable than those expected to randomly form in sequences of comparable size and composition.
However, nonsynonymous mutations are constantly more in M genes, thus suggesting that purifying selection might be stronger in the F mitochondrial genome.
Similar(57)
"There's constantly more, more, more.
Over the course of time, these indices and surrogate parameters of pulmonary gas exchange were constantly more impaired in ARDS patients with NRBC levels above 220/µl compared to ARDS patients with NRBC counts below that threshold.
With my dad, whatever's going on inside his head is constantly more alive and mesmerizing than any physical object.
Surprisingly, PGEC were constantly more resistant to the lytic effect of HSV than immortalized genital epithelial cells.
Interestingly, we observed that PGEC isolated from various donors were constantly more resistant to the lytic effect of HSV than immortalized epithelial cells (i.e., HeLa cells).
Figure 2a shows that inclusion of essential medicines was constantly more aligned with the therapeutic guidelines in middle income countries compared to low income countries (p = 0.047).
You are constantly receiving more and more requests for services that used to come from other areas".
We are preparing hundreds more Footprints to add to the site for the batch upload, and we are constantly seeking more!
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com