Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
The phrase "are consistent with works" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing how certain findings, ideas, or actions align with established research or literature in a particular field.
Example: "The results of this study are consistent with works published in previous years, confirming the validity of the hypothesis."
Alternatives: "align with research" or "correspond with studies".
Similar(60)
However, the latter null-findings are consistent with work by Kondo (2011).
These results are consistent with work on the larvae of several other lepidopteran species, in which a melanic phenotype is produced as a plastic response to the environment.
These data are consistent with work utilizing monolayers showing that a Salmonella invA mutant was unable to grow after induced invasion of epithelial cells [68].
These results are consistent with work on wild populations.
The low antiviral prescription rates observed in this study are consistent with work previously undertaken by our group in this population [ 24].
Although novel within the infant literature, our results are consistent with work on attentional control and executive components in older children.
The results of the present study are consistent with work carried out on Johne's disease in cattle caused by M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) [ 47, 48].
Note that this is consistent with works by Parrella et al. (2003) and Tschentscher et al. (2001) who delimited small 3p regions from partial chromosome 3 deletion patients.
This is consistent with work showing that application of cow dung to rice paddies in Bangladesh raised porewater DOC and As concentrations [46].
This is consistent with work showing that CTL targeting Gag, which is relatively intolerant of mutations, are associated with lower viral loads [32], [33].
Our findings were consistent with work in similar settings.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com