Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The part of the sentence "are consistent with the" is correct and usable in written English.
It is often used to indicate that something is consistent with, or agrees with, something else. For example: "The observations we made in the lab are consistent with the results from previous experiments."
Exact(60)
These patterns are consistent with the tcdC sequencing results.
These results are consistent with the results of organoleptic evaluation.
The data are consistent with the observations made in mice8.
These results are consistent with the RNA-Seq analysis.
These are consistent with the experimental observations.
variables are consistent with the value of the independent variable.
are consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity.
The measurements are consistent with the standard model expectations.
The measured asymmetries are consistent with the standard model predictions.
Both are consistent with the set value.
These are consistent with the pooled sample.
More suggestions(25)
are consistent with the fossilised
are consistent with the availability of
are consistent with the expected pattern of economic benefit
are consistent with the fct that
are consistent with the remains
are consistent with the tenets
are consistent with the data recorded
are consistent with the configuration of
are consistent with the preferred
and is consistent with the disparity
are consistent with the kinetic
are consistent with the continuing
are consistent with the impairment of
are consistent with the subsequent
are consistent with the achievement
are consistent with the already reported
are consistent with the establishment of
are consistent with the numerous reports
are consistent with the continuation
are consistent with the manually
are consistent with the continued
be consistent with the aspirations
are cohesive with the
are constant with the
are uniform with the
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com