Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "are consistent with massive" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used in contexts where you want to indicate that something aligns or agrees with something that is large or significant in scale or impact.
Example: "The findings of the study are consistent with massive trends observed in climate change data."
Alternatives: "align with substantial" or "correspond with significant".
Exact(1)
The data obtained in this study, although providing no direct indication on the actual events leading to the high HBV prevalence in the 2 communities, are consistent with massive transmission that resulted in rapid expansion of the HBV/E-infected population.
Similar(59)
The observed phyletic pattern is consistent with massive gene loss in most fungi, but HGT from nitrogen-fixing bacteria that also synthesize helvolic acid [ 60] cannot be completely excluded.
The features seen in this galaxy are consistent with it being a massive spiral that formed from a long series of minor mergers, but having been relatively quiet on that front for billions of years.
Clinical manifestations during the disease attack are consistent with a strong inflammatory response, with fever, massive influx of polymorphonuclear leukocytes into the affected tissues, neutrophilia, and acute-phase response.
These data are consistent with the results of computer-generated models of massive transfusion [ 277].
In fact, the impacts of climate change -- like massive droughts, typhoons, and storms -- are already appearing and are consistent with climate change scenario predictions.
Our observations in P. falciparum are consistent with a model in which genome-wide nucleosome eviction at the trophozoite stage drives massive transcriptional activity.
All the circumstances are consistent with suicide.
Leading indicators are consistent with softening ahead.
The data are consistent with national numbers.
They are consistent with American policy since 1967.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com