Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are consistent to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are consistent to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct phrase would be "are consistent with." Example: "The results of the study are consistent with previous research findings."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
This index is sometimes referred to as the modified standardised response mean, or to as the index of responsiveness.[ 16] Internal consistency refers to the extent to which individual items of the instrument are consistent to one another and reflect an underlying scheme or construct.
Science
Nevertheless, the performance results of this study are consistent to the results of listening experiments.
The presented results of FTIR, FESEM, and XRD so far are consistent to each other.
Science
These results obtained in this study are consistent to adapt in the clinical application.
These findings are consistent to the findings of Daniel and Titman (1997) or Daniel et al.
Science
The numerical methods give results that are consistent to nine significant digits after 38 iterations of the spectral relaxation method.
Science
Overall, the results are consistent to the descriptive statistics in Table 3 and the results using the enforcement variable.
Science
Furthermore, objective criteria and informal subjective tests are consistent to find the best weights in the unit selection.
These results are consistent to the ones from the Monte-Carlo simulation and the detail is given in Table 5.
All empirical results are consistent to show that the penalization with regard to solution quality is relatively small.
The phenomena in MMORPGs are consistent to situated cognition where human knowledge and interaction cannot be divorced from the world (Lave and Wenger 1991).
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use "are consistent with" instead of "are consistent to". This ensures grammatical correctness and clarity in your writing.
Common error
Avoid using "to" after "consistent". The correct preposition to use is "with". For example, it's "The data are consistent with the hypothesis", not "The data are consistent to the hypothesis".
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase is intended to function as a relational expression, indicating agreement or conformity between two or more entities. However, as noted by Ludwig AI, the correct form is "are consistent with", so this phrase is used incorrectly.
Frequent in
Science
89%
Formal & Business
10%
News & Media
1%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "are consistent to" is frequently used, particularly in scientific and formal writing, to express agreement or conformity between different elements. However, according to Ludwig AI, the correct grammatical form is "are consistent with". Despite its common occurrence, especially in scientific publications, it's important to use the grammatically correct alternative to maintain clarity and professionalism in writing. Using "are consistent with" ensures that your writing aligns with standard English grammar rules. Remember to always double-check your preposition choice and consider using alternatives like "are in agreement with" or "correspond to" for variety and precision.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are in agreement with
This alternative uses a more direct expression of agreement, replacing "consistent to" with "in agreement with".
are aligned with
This option suggests a spatial or directional correspondence, implying that things are arranged in a similar way.
correspond to
This suggests a direct relationship or matching between two things.
are in accordance with
This is a more formal alternative, indicating that something is following a set of rules or principles.
are compatible with
This suggests that two or more things can exist or occur together without conflict.
harmonize with
This alternative conveys a sense of aesthetic or functional compatibility.
are analogous to
This suggests a comparison, implying that something is similar in some respects but not identical.
tally with
This option implies a precise numerical or quantitative agreement.
square with
This means to be consistent or compatible with something, often used when resolving apparent contradictions.
dovetail with
This suggests that two things fit together neatly and harmoniously.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say something agrees with something else?
The correct way is to say that something "is consistent with" something else. For example, "The findings are consistent with the initial hypothesis."
What can I say instead of "are consistent to"?
Use alternatives such as "are consistent with", "are in agreement with", or "correspond to" depending on the specific context.
Which is correct, "are consistent to" or "are consistent with"?
"Are consistent with" is the grammatically correct phrase. "Are consistent to" is generally considered incorrect.
How do I ensure I use the phrase "are consistent with" correctly in my writing?
Double-check that you're using "with" and not "to" after "consistent". A helpful tip is to remember that you're showing agreement with something, not directing consistency to it.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested