Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "are considered matched" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing items, elements, or criteria that are deemed to be in agreement or alignment with each other.
Example: "In this study, the samples are considered matched based on their demographic characteristics."
Alternatives: "are deemed equivalent" or "are regarded as aligned".
Exact(2)
Three optimum detectors are considered: matched filter, signal gating, and prewhitened signal gating.
That is, once two properties are considered matched, they both find the best matched one from the other property list.
Similar(58)
In the strict measure, the system annotations are considered matching with the gold standard annotations if they hit the same spans of text; whereas in the overlapping measure, both annotations are matching when they share a common span of text.
A reference cell, R, and a segmented one, S, are considered matching if the following condition holds: Note, for each reference cell, there can be one segmented object at most.
A reference sequence was considered matched only when > 90% coverage was reached.
If the ratio of a gene was ≥ 1 or ≤ 1 for both platforms being compared, the expression was considered matched irrespective of the magnitude.
A reference sequence was considered matched only when > 90% nucleotides were covered by query reads at ≥ 99% identity (Additional file 3: Figure S2).
We define following formula (1) for approximation-based text comparison and we require that the similarity must be higher than 0.8 for two sequences to be considered matched.
RFLP patterns with <20 identical bands, or >20 bands and differing by no more than a single band, were considered matched.
Therefore, there is a possibility that patients with candidemia that may have had identical matching risk factors but negative blood culture were considered matching controls instead of cases.
However, when SVM is considered, matching score fusion produced a better result than feature-level fusion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com