Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
The phrase "are considered as reference" is not correct in standard written English.
It should be "are considered reference" or "are considered as a reference."
Example: "These documents are considered reference for the research project."
Alternatives: "are regarded as reference" or "are viewed as a reference."
Exact(10)
Basically, BSs are considered as reference nodes (anchors) for localization.
Both bulk mean and space averaged temperatures are considered as reference temperatures in the analytical solution.
Such vessels are considered as reference safe vessels since their operational life came to an end without any hazards.
Besides the proposed Schemes 1 and 2, the following two schemes are considered as reference schemes for performance comparison.
Detection schemes based on Doppler processors (Moving Target Indicator (MTI) and Moving Target Detector (MTD)) and conventional CFAR detectors are considered as reference.
The measured winding responses obtained due to injection of 1 μs reference pulse across the winding are considered as reference responses.
Similar(50)
Coverage probabilities obtained when 0% data are missing are considered as references for comparing with those obtained when 15% or 30% data are missing.
The empirical standard errors obtained when 0% data are missing are considered as references for comparing with those obtained when 15% or 30% data are missing.
Standardized biases obtained when 0% data are missing are considered as references for comparing with those obtained when 15% or 30% data are missing.
The root mean squared errors obtained when 0% data are missing are considered as references for comparing with those obtained when 15% or 30% data are missing.
Pure oxygen (O2) is considered as reference data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com