The phrase "are comprehensive with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is not commonly used and may lead to confusion; a more appropriate phrase would be "are comprehensive in" or "are comprehensive about."
Example: "The report is comprehensive in its analysis of the market trends."
Alternatives: "are thorough in" or "are detailed about".
Because American FTAs are comprehensive, with high standards, our FTA partners stand out as good places to invest, as strong links in a global sourcing chain, or simply as promising markets in which to do business.We will work with our FTA partners through USAID and with the multilateral development banks to link liberalisation to sectoral reforms.
In our study, the symptoms in inquiry diagnosis are comprehensive, with a total of 125 symptoms.
The Third International Dictionary, Unabridged version is comprehensive, with 257,000 definitions.
In the end his defeat was comprehensive, with Oswald taking 23,013 votes to Murphy's 19,250.
The shop's stock is comprehensive with any out-of-stock book available often within 24 hours.
But these reconstitutions have to be comprehensive, with built-in genetic information, spatial gene expression patterns, proteomic and metabolomics profiles.
"New York's Money Funnels," your Aug. 13 editorial regarding a loophole in the state's campaign finance laws that allows corporations to surpass contribution limits to candidates by forming subsidiaries, was comprehensive, with one exception.
While the menu at this 80-seat restaurant is relatively succinct, the wine list is comprehensive, with excellent selections from each of the wine areas in South Australia and a range of classics from the house of Penfold.
The model is comprehensive with all necessary physics and includes the presence of discrete energy levels in these nanocrystals and also the effect of shift in energy levels in the nanocrystals with more than one electron.
Duke University Stores is comprehensive, with 32 different computer, retail, book, and office service operations serving the University community for more than 80 years.
Because it is impossible to be comprehensive with the limited space available in this venue, I will simply point to two examples to support my contention.
