All results are compared with respect to blank experiments conducted with Ar and no N2 added.
In addition, different bipolar technologies and device designs are compared with respect to electrothermal feedback.
Experimental rock cutting, field and theoretical results are compared with respect to rock cutting science.
They are compared with respect to optimality and computational performance by means of repeated random tests.
The methods are compared with respect to accuracy, efficiency, ease-of-use, robustness, and interpretability.
The devices are compared with respect to pressure drop and separation efficiency.
The solutions are compared with respect to complexity, accuracy and computation time.
In this paper, these three approaches are compared with respect to their limitations, simplicity and accuracy.
The process configurations are compared with respect to total energy consumption, including thermal and electrical energy used.
The performances of the optimization methods are compared with respect to efficiency and ability to obtain a global optimum.
Different material models are compared with respect to their suitability for the design of process, tooling and product.
