Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Treatment groups are compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by comparative t-tests where appropriate.
Treatments are compared using ANOVA (Tukey Kramer multiple comparison, p < 0.05).
Treatments are compared using ANOVA (Tukey Kramer multiple comparions, p < 0.05).
The results are compared using 41 earthquake ground motions.
Model results are compared using several different risk measures.
Experimental results are compared using 23 benchmark functions.
The results are compared using statistics and visual assessment.
In this study, shotgun-sequenced data from paired dental calculus and dentin samples from 48 globally distributed individuals are compared using a metagenomic approach.
In Fig. 4, the electrochemical properties of LN15, LN20, LNF15, and shaker-milled LNF15 (S-LNF15) are compared using galvanostatic cycling between 1.5 and 4.6 V.
Performances of several different membrane designs are compared using the model.
The three analyses are compared using average degree, density, and average path length.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com