are charged with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are charged with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that someone has been given a responsibility or duty, often in a formal or legal context. Example: "The committee members are charged with overseeing the implementation of the new policy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Both officers are charged with rape.

The New York Times

They are charged with manslaughter.

The New York Times

Hundreds are charged with crimes.

The Washington Post

Both are charged with receiving bribes.

The New York Times

Both men are charged with high treason.

The New York Times

The three others are charged with complicity.

The New York Times

They are charged with protecting vulnerable civilians.

The Guardian - Opinion

Both are charged with conspiracy and fraud.

The New York Times

Now 10 are charged with hazing.

The Washington Post

Two defendants are charged with criminal harassment, and two are charged with stalking.

The New York Times

We are charged with defending ourselves and we are charged with speaking up.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are charged with", ensure the subject clearly identifies who is being given the responsibility or facing the accusation. Clarity prevents ambiguity in legal and formal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "are charged with" when an active construction is more appropriate. For example, instead of "They are charged with protecting the environment", consider "They are responsible for protecting the environment" if you want to emphasize their role more actively.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are charged with" functions primarily as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject is receiving the action of being charged. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent use across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Academia

25%

Science

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are charged with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction, primarily functioning to indicate that someone has been formally accused of something or assigned a specific duty. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. Predominantly found in news and academic contexts, it maintains a neutral to formal register. While alternatives like "are accused of" or "are tasked with" may be suitable depending on the specific nuance, "are charged with" is a reliable phrase for formal and legal communications. Its high frequency and consistent usage across authoritative sources underscore its credibility and widespread acceptance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are accused of

Focuses specifically on accusations, often in a legal context.

are tasked with

Emphasizes the assignment of a particular task or responsibility.

are responsible for

Highlights the accountability for an action or outcome.

are entrusted with

Indicates that someone has been given a special duty or responsibility.

have the duty to

Stresses the obligation to perform a specific action.

are assigned to

Implies a formal assignment, often in a professional or organizational setting.

are liable for

Highlights the legal responsibility for something.

are indicted on

Specifically refers to a formal accusation by a grand jury.

are held accountable for

Emphasizes that someone will be answerable for their actions.

are designated to

Indicates a formal appointment or designation to a role or task.

FAQs

How is "are charged with" used in legal contexts?

In legal settings, "are charged with" indicates that someone is formally accused of a crime. For example, "The defendants are charged with conspiracy and fraud."

What's the difference between "are charged with" and "are accused of"?

"Are accused of" implies an allegation that may not yet be formally proven, while "are charged with" suggests a formal accusation has been made by authorities. Therefore, being charged generally represents a more advanced stage in legal proceedings.

What can I say instead of "are charged with" to indicate responsibility?

You can use alternatives like "are tasked with", "are responsible for", or "are entrusted with" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "are charged with" in informal settings?

While "are charged with" is typically used in more formal contexts, it is grammatically correct and understandable in informal settings, although alternatives like "are responsible for" might sound more natural.