are categorized with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are categorized with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing how items, concepts, or groups are classified or grouped together based on certain criteria. Example: "In the library, books on history are categorized with other non-fiction titles."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

In addition, an overview of potential bioactive peptides and ligands that could be used to direct behaviour of endogenous cells are categorized with their biological effects.

Acta Biomaterialia

Returned items are categorized with respect to their quality level into classes called return types, and a different incentive is offered for each return type.

International Journal of Production Economics

Returned products are categorized with respect to their quality levels, and a different acquisition price is offered for each return type.

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Generalized echelon will have the ability to produce/distribute all forward materials/products and recover/redistribute simultaneously all the returned which are categorized with respect to their quality zone.

Computers & Chemical Engineering

The models are categorized with respect to the scale of investigation, the type of loading and the class of fibrous materials being addressed, unless the model is adaptable to any fibrous structure.

Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing

For all calculations made here, the dairy cattle livestock populations include only milk-producing mature dairy cows; calves, heifers, breeding steers, and any other dairy cattle 'replacements' are categorized with meat/other cattle.

Carbon Balance and Management

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

48 human-written examples

"What's really at stake," said Robert Thompson, professor of media and pop culture at Syracuse University, "is one big decision: Are these shows going to be categorized with W.W.F.

The New York Times - Arts

But those communities' reactions have less to do with tolerating crime than with the indignity that comes with being categorized with criminals.

The New Yorker

"It's a great award and a privilege to be categorized with some of the other players that are being considered," White told reporters last Monday.

The New York Times - Sports

Until the mid-1870s the new "French Flats" were categorized with private houses under "First Class Dwellings," even though they were technically tenement houses.

The New York Times

Or are they going to be categorized with 'Jeopardy' and other game shows, where you're not supposed to fool around with reality?" The F.C.C. could, of course, decide that the charges against "Manhunt" are baseless or out of its jurisdiction, in which case those seeking answers would surely be disappointed.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are categorized with", ensure that the criteria for categorization are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. Specify the characteristics that link the items being grouped together.

Common error

Avoid categorizing items together based on superficial similarities. Ensure there's a meaningful connection or shared attribute that justifies the grouping to maintain clarity and relevance.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are categorized with" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating that items are being assigned to a specific category based on shared attributes. Ludwig examples demonstrate its use in various scientific and general contexts. The Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

79%

News & Media

17%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "are categorized with" is a grammatically sound phrase commonly used to indicate that items or concepts are grouped based on shared attributes. According to Ludwig, it is suitable for various contexts, particularly in science and news media, with a neutral to formal register. While the phrase is generally correct, pay attention to clearly defining the criteria for categorization. Ludwig AI confirms the appropriateness of its use in formal, scientific, and professional settings. Using alternative phrasing like "are classified alongside" can enhance clarity based on context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are classified alongside

Replaces "categorized" with "classified" and uses "alongside" instead of "with".

are grouped together with

Focuses on the act of grouping rather than categorizing.

are associated with

Emphasizes a connection or relationship rather than a strict classification.

are linked to

Highlights a link or connection between items.

are sorted with

Implies a more structured or organized classification process.

are filed under

Suggests a specific organizational system, often in a physical or digital context.

are indexed with

Commonly used in the context of databases or information retrieval.

are bracketed with

Implies that items fall within a certain range or limit.

are cataloged with

Suitable for formal listings and records.

are compartmented with

Used when items are distinctly separated into groups.

FAQs

How can I use "are categorized with" in a sentence?

Use "are categorized with" to describe how items or concepts are grouped based on shared characteristics. For example: "Books in the library are categorized with respect to genre".

What are some alternatives to "are categorized with"?

Alternatives include "are classified alongside", "are grouped together with", or "are associated with" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "is categorized with" instead of "are categorized with"?

No, use "is categorized with" for singular subjects and "are categorized with" for plural subjects. For example, "This item is categorized with the others" versus "These items are categorized with the others".

What's the difference between "are categorized with" and "are classified as"?

"Are classified as" implies a formal or official classification, while "are categorized with" suggests a more general grouping. Using "are categorized with" doesn't necessarily mean there's a system in place, unlike "are classified as".