Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are categorized from
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are categorized from" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to indicate the source or basis for categorization. Example: "The animals are categorized from their habitats, such as terrestrial, aquatic, and aerial."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
Wiki
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
In terms of uncertainties, risks are categorized from low, medium, and high, depending on the overall impact of risks.
The extent of growth relative to plates containing glucose are categorized from high to non-detectable using the following designations: +++, ++, +, ±, -.
Science
LDCT findings are categorized from 1-4 according to the likelihood of malignancy. 1 and 2 are considered benign findings and 3 and 4 have a higher probability of malignancy.
Science
Hotels in France are categorized from 1-star to 4-star L (or luxury).
Wiki
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
Responses were categorized from "not at all concerned" to "highly concerned".
Voice samples were categorized from low to high conception risk based on menstrual cycle phase and empirical pregnancy data.
Science
Cases in which BIM is used can be categorized from different perspectives and include practical applications and more generic applications.
Science
PT Garuda Indonesia, Tbk is the largest airline in Indonesia when it is categorized from its flying scope and number of passengers carried each year.
For LIS, each of the four components is categorized from 0 to 4, where a higher number is worse (Table 1).
Science
After summing the Likert-scaled items of this domain, it is categorized from 0 (lowest level of pain) to 100 (highest level of pain) [31].
Thus, how to reasonably model camera shake blurring plays a central role in non-uniform deblurring problem that can be categorized from two aspects.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing how items are grouped, use more precise language such as "are classified based on", "are grouped according to", or "are divided by" to clearly indicate the criteria used for categorization.
Common error
Avoid using "from" to indicate the basis of categorization. "From" typically denotes a source or origin, not the criteria for grouping. Instead of saying "are categorized from their habitats", specify "are categorized based on their habitats".
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are categorized from" is used to describe how items are assigned to different categories. However, as Ludwig AI points out, this phrasing is not grammatically correct in standard written English.
Frequent in
Science
75%
News & Media
12%
Wiki
13%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "are categorized from" is used to describe how items are classified, but it is not grammatically correct in standard English. As Ludwig AI explains, it's better to use alternatives like "are classified based on" or "are grouped according to" to more accurately indicate the criteria for categorization. Although examples can be found across different source types, including scientific and news media, it's advisable to avoid this phrasing in formal writing. While the intended meaning is generally understood, using grammatically sound alternatives ensures clarity and precision.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are classified based on
This alternative focuses on the criteria used for classification, replacing "categorized from" with a more explicit indicator of the basis for categorization.
are grouped according to
This emphasizes the method of grouping, specifying that the grouping is done according to a certain standard or criteria.
are divided by
This alternative indicates the division of items based on specific criteria.
are sorted by
This highlights the process of sorting items into categories based on their characteristics.
are organized by
This suggests a structured arrangement of items into categories, emphasizing the organizational aspect of categorization.
are arranged by
This is similar to "are organized by" but emphasizes the physical arrangement or order of the categories.
are segmented by
This alternative focuses on dividing a larger group into smaller, distinct segments based on shared characteristics.
are indexed by
This highlights the use of an index to categorize and locate items based on specific criteria.
are cataloged by
This emphasizes the creation of a catalog or list to organize items into categories.
are delineated by
This suggests that categories are clearly defined and separated based on specific characteristics.
FAQs
What's a better way to phrase "are categorized from"?
Consider using alternatives like "are classified based on", "are grouped according to", or "are divided by" for clearer and more accurate phrasing.
Is "are categorized from" grammatically correct?
No, "are categorized from" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's more accurate to say "are categorized based on" or "are categorized according to" to indicate the criteria used for categorization.
When is it appropriate to use "are categorized from"?
While not grammatically ideal, "are categorized from" may appear in some informal contexts. However, for formal writing, it's best to use alternatives like "are classified based on" or "are grouped according to".
How does "are categorized from" differ from "are categorized by"?
"Are categorized by" indicates the agent or method doing the categorization, while "are categorized from" is often incorrectly used to indicate the basis or criteria for categorization. It's better to use alternatives like "are classified based on" when describing the basis of categorization.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested