are better for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are better for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is more advantageous or suitable for a particular purpose or situation. Example: "These new policies are better for employee morale and productivity."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

And we are better for it.

The New York Times

The prospects are better for the latter.

The New York Times

Both are better for it.

The New York Times - Sports

They are better for amateurs.

The New York Times

Bananas are better for you".

The New York Times

"Priests are better for that".

The New York Times

We are better for having known you.

The New York Times

Raw foods are better for you.

The Guardian

"Queen beds are better for couples".

The New York Times

And we are better for that.

The Guardian - Opinion

But we are better for knowing him.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are better for", ensure the context clearly defines what is being compared and for whom or what it is advantageous. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "are better for" without specific context. Stating that something is generally better without specifying the criteria or beneficiaries weakens your argument. Provide clear reasons and evidence to support your claim.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are better for" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, indicating that something is superior or more advantageous in a specific context or for a particular purpose. Ludwig examples showcase its use in various scenarios, from health advice to business strategy.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Wiki

24%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "are better for" is a versatile comparative phrase widely used to indicate superiority or greater suitability in various contexts. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness and common usage across diverse domains like news, science, and general writing. When employing this phrase, clarity and specificity are key to ensuring your message is effectively conveyed. Remember to clearly define what is being compared and the criteria for superiority to avoid ambiguity. By considering these aspects, you can confidently and accurately use "are better for" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are more suitable for

Emphasizes appropriateness or fitness for a particular purpose or situation.

are more advantageous to

Highlights the benefits or advantages something provides.

are more beneficial for

Focuses on the positive impact or helpfulness of something.

are preferable for

Indicates a favored or desired option in a given context.

are more effective for

Stresses the efficiency or success rate of something in achieving a specific outcome.

are more appropriate for

Highlights the suitability or correctness of something in a particular situation.

are more conducive to

Indicates that something helps to bring about a particular result.

are more favorable to

Suggests that something creates a more positive or supportive environment.

are more well-suited to

Focuses on how well something matches the requirements or demands of a situation.

are more inclined to

Indicates that a certain outcome is more likely as a result of an action or state.

FAQs

How can I use "are better for" in a sentence?

Use "are better for" to express that one option is more advantageous or suitable than another in a specific context. For example, "Smaller step sizes "are better for noise averaging"."

What are some alternatives to "are better for"?

You can use phrases like "are more suitable for", "are more advantageous to", or "are more beneficial for" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it grammatically correct to say "is better for" instead of "are better for"?

The choice between "is" and "are" depends on the subject. Use "is better for" with singular subjects and "are better for" with plural subjects. For example, "This strategy is better for individual investors" vs. "These strategies are better for individual investors."

What's the difference between "are better for" and "are good for"?

"Are better for" implies a comparison, indicating one thing is superior to another in a specific context. "Are good for" simply suggests something is beneficial or advantageous without necessarily implying a comparison. For instance, "Apples are good for your health" vs. "Apples are better for your health than candy."