Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

are also not included

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are also not included" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that certain items or elements are excluded from a list or group, often in a formal or explanatory context. Example: "The final report will cover the main findings, but the supplementary data are also not included."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

40 human-written examples

References are also not included in the page limits.

Funds backing Britain's bailed-out banks are also not included in official figures.

News & Media

The New York Times

Target therapies that are in clinical development but not enrolling lung cancer patients are also not included.

In addition to the higher cost options, the autumn only selections are also not included in the final choice.

Four rather more celebrated names are also not included on my list: Hardy, Yeats, Eliot and Auden.

In addition to the higher cost options, the Escondido Village one-bedroom, double occupancy and two-bedroom, triple occupancy apartments are also not included in the final choice.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

20 human-written examples

They are also not including in the total divorce rate.

These abnormal subjects were also not included other coexistent heart valvular disorder.

The range of studio films available to HBO subscribers on HBO Go is also not included.

Patients admitted to an intensive care unit were also not included.

Science & Research

Nature

"That would have an immediate effect," Mr. Fredrich said, as would a payroll tax holiday, which is also not included.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using this phrase in formal writing, maintain consistency in tone and avoid overly informal alternatives unless appropriate for the audience.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by clearly specifying what the subjects "are also not included" within. Without a clear reference, the reader may misunderstand the scope of the exclusion, leading to confusion.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are also not included" functions as a predicate in a sentence, indicating that certain items or elements are excluded from a specific group or category. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a standard and acceptable usage in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

26%

Academia

21%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

4%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are also not included" is a common and grammatically correct way to specify exclusions in writing. As demonstrated by the Ludwig examples, it frequently appears in scientific, academic, and news contexts, indicating its versatility across different domains. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by explicitly stating what the subjects "are also not included" within, preventing ambiguity. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, so writers can confidently incorporate it into their work.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "are also not included" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, you can use phrases like "are likewise excluded", "are furthermore excluded", or "are additionally omitted".

What's a simpler way to say "are also not included"?

Simpler alternatives include "are also left out" or just "are not included", depending on the context and the desired level of emphasis.

How does "are also not included" differ from "are not considered"?

"Are also not included" implies a direct exclusion from a set or group. "Are not considered" suggests that something is not being taken into account in a particular assessment or evaluation, which has a slightly different meaning.

Is it redundant to use "also" in "are also not included"?

While "are not included" is grammatically correct, using "also" emphasizes that something is being added to a list of exclusions. It can be useful for clarity when multiple items are being discussed.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: