are all the things

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are all the things" is not a complete or standard expression in written English, but it can be used in informal contexts.
You can use it when asking about the existence or status of multiple items or concepts, often in a casual or conversational tone. Example: "Are all the things we discussed ready for the meeting tomorrow?"

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Beyond these natural components are all the things that can be added to wine.

The New York Times

"They are all the things that go through our minds and we have to weigh up," Hodgson said.

The Guardian - Sport

"They are all the things I believe the country wants and that is what we are going to be talking about in the coming months".

BBC

The songs are all the things that happen in the middle of that".

Wikipedia

Our potatoes are all the things in pop culture that provide us with escape and some mental sustenance while the world seems to crash around us.

Huffington Post

Those are all the things it is about, he said.

Independent

Those are all the things you need — the fundamentals".

The New Yorker

You are all the things that are wrong with you.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Those are all the things you need the fundamentals".

The New Yorker

Where are all the things I learned, the books I read, the poems I memorized?

The New Yorker

"Those are all the things that help us be stronger and more effective".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are all the things", ensure the context clearly indicates what 'things' refers to, avoiding ambiguity for your reader.

Common error

Avoid using "are all the things" in highly formal or academic writing; opt for more precise and professional language like "encompasses all aspects" or "includes every element".

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "are all the things" is to introduce a comprehensive list or category. As Ludwig's examples show, it is often used to preface a series of items or aspects under consideration.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Wiki

13%

Science

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are all the things" serves to introduce a comprehensive list or category, often in a neutral register as shown by its prevalent use in news and media. Ludwig AI marks it as acceptable and its frequent appearance indicates its widespread acceptance in various contexts. While versatile, it's best to reserve it for situations where the context is clear and the tone does not demand high formality. When precision is paramount, substituting the phrase with alternatives like "include everything" or "encompass all aspects" can improve clarity and professionalism.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

considers all items

It's a more direct way of saying that everything is taken into account.

covers every point

It means addressing each matter thoroughly.

encompass all aspects

Emphasizes the inclusion of all facets or dimensions of a subject.

involves every element

This focuses on the components that are part of something.

include everything

Focuses on encompassing all items without explicitly listing them.

account for everything

Highlights the consideration or inclusion of all relevant factors.

takes into account every detail

It places an emphasis on thoroughness.

contains each feature

Highlights a comprehensive set of functionalities.

cover all bases

Implies addressing all potential concerns or requirements.

lists every item

Used when presenting a thorough and complete inventory.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "are all the things" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider alternatives such as "encompasses all aspects", "includes all items", or "accounts for everything". Each of these phrases offers a similar meaning but provides a more professional tone depending on the specific context.

Is "are all the things" grammatically correct?

While widely used, "are all the things" might be considered informal. According to Ludwig, it's an acceptable phrase. In more formal settings, it's advisable to use alternatives that clearly specify what "things" refers to.

What's the difference between "are all the things" and "include everything"?

"Are all the things" generally introduces a list or a comprehensive overview, while "include everything" more broadly indicates a complete inclusion without necessarily enumerating specific items.

When is it appropriate to use "are all the things"?

This phrase is suitable in casual conversations, news articles, and blog posts where a less formal tone is acceptable. Avoid it in academic papers, formal reports, or professional communications where precision and formality are important.