The phrase "are able to present" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
One possible example of using it in a sentence is: "Through extensive research and preparation, we are able to present a comprehensive report to our clients." In this sentence, the phrase "are able to present" means that the speaker has the ability or capability to present the report due to their hard work and effort.
As we have described in the previous section, DCs are able to present lipid antigens by CD1 antigen-presenting molecules.
CD8 CTLs are able to present peptides to each other via their own MHC class I (self-presentation), when pulsed with OVA peptide.
"We are able to present and control our own image".
"It is based on how well people are able to present their program and show there will be some results".
This is important when you consider that in China, few native companies are able to present work that engages with current Chinese politics for fear of censorship.
For now, friends and foes of the PM are able to present rounded cases both for and against him – sometimes citing the same evidence.
Lindsay Johns protested that it was "massively condescending" to believe that children can only respond to Shakespeare's plays if teachers are able to present them as "achingly cool".
Using maps only when they are able to present a clear, compelling and informative visualisation will ensure they remain valuable and high-impact instruments for raising awareness of issues on both the global and national scale.
"At Tate Britain it represents something like 20% of our sponsorship income, that is a significant sum of money and it is a material sum in terms of what we are able to present to the public.
Second, because these murders and shootings took place in a short time span -- that would be the initial five homicides and six shootings -- four of those within a two-and-a-half-hour time frame and because they occurred in such close proximity, we are able to present the best and most extensive evidence here in Montgomery County.
Re-activist judges are able to present themselves as "strict constructionists" or "originalists" by arguing, as does Justice Clarence Thomas, that any case decided wrongly (i.e., not in accordance with the framers of the Constitution) should simply be erased, as though erasure is somehow a passive act.
