Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Creating the online archive cost more than $200,000.
Similar(58)
Access to the online archive costs $30 a year.
And in the meantime, a subscription to The New Yorker, which includes 47 paper issues a year and full access to the Web site and archive, costs just $39.95 — far too little, in my opinion, but that's a subject for another day… Happy New Year everybody.
And in the meantime, a subscription to The New Yorker, which includes 47 paper issues a year and full access to the Web site and archive, costs just $39.95 — far too little, in my opinion, but that's a subject for another day… John Cassidy has been a staff writer at The New Yorker since 1995.
Jennifer M. Tisdale, a spokeswoman for the center, said that the archives cost $2 million, and that 80 percent of the cost was covered by donors, among them Michael and Jeanne Klein; the Marlene Nathan Meyerson Foundation; and Mark Wawro and Melanie Gray.
The archiving costs can be split into two components.
A concern brought by this open-ended acceptance policy is that all DNA sequences are treated identically in terms of archiving method and hence incur equal archiving costs.
The Digital Media Initiative (DMI), which aimed to create a production system linked to the Corporation's vast broadcasting archive, has cost £98.4m since it started in 2008.
A recent McDonald's TV ad depicting a carful of cruising teenagers consisted entirely of film footage from Getty's archive and cost one-tenth of the typical $300,000 for a 30-second spot.
Furthermore, it would build the case worldwide for public broadcasting – a public broadcast archive being the cost of entry for admission to the club of sharing nations.
The emergency response team offered advice on repairing a misshapen, waterlogged mask (which has since been fixed and used in a performance) and found a vendor, Belfor Property Restoration in Fort Worth, to freeze-dry some of the 87-year-old dance company's archives at no cost.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com