Sentence examples for archaeological date from inspiring English sources
The phrase "archaeological date" is correct and can be used in written English
It generally refers to an estimate of the age of an artifact or other archaeological feature based on various forms of evidence, such as carbon dating. For example: "The archaeological date of the fossilized bone was estimated to be around 10,000 years old."
The split between the two main branches in the European tree suggests that modern humans reached Europe 39,000 to 51,000 years ago, Dr. Wallace calculates, a time that corresponds with the archaeological date of at least 35,000 years ago.
The archaeological date of the skeletal remains from St. Albani churchyard is between AD 1050 and 1530 [21].
This fact points to an error in the archaeological date by arm position (AD 1250 1400) as compared to reliable radiocarbon date of calAD 1443 1466 at 1 sigma.
In 2012 one of the proponents of an archaeological date, Felix Höflmayer, argued that archaeological evidence could be consistent with a date as early as 1590 BCE, reducing the discrepancy to around fifty years.
The eruption's chemical signatures have been found in Greenland ice cores from 1646 BCE.. Recently, a dating of the Eruption at about 1570 BCE (which would fit in with both radiocarbon - unsequenced- results and with proxy-data as Volcanic-tied acidity peaks in Greenland ice-cores) was suggested by some scholars, including formerly proponent of an archaeological date Tiziano Fantuzzi.
The age for another potential founder clade H1 (16260) was also estimated at 6.3 ± 2.9 kya, much older than the archaeological date [ 55].
The archaeological dates are in agreement with the Anales de Cuauhtitlán and the Codex Ramírez (see below The nature of the sources).
The computer's date of 2,182 years ago for the origin of the tree fits reasonably well with the archaeological dates for the Yayoi culture, he reported Tuesday in The Proceedings of the Royal Society.
Genetic dates are based on a mixture of statistics and best guesses, but the split times calculated by the Danish team are compatible with the more reliable archaeological dates, which record the earliest known human presence in Australia at 44,000 years ago.
In fact, the width of the growth rings visible on the surface of the cut tree trunk provides a partial history of climatic conditions, the spacing of the growth rings of different size having been correlated with known periods of drought and cold to provide reliable archaeological dating of various structures, as in the timbers used in Indian pueblos in the southwestern United States.
The radiocarbon ages do not completely coincide with the archaeological dates of the individuals.
