Several arbitration organizations are available, like the American Arbitration Association (the "AAA").
Arbitration organizations, such as the American Arbitration Association AAAandand the National Arbitration Forum NAFF), compete to provide arbitration services for companies.
While enforceability and latitude concern the power boundaries of meta-organizations, information access and fast decision making, as further attributes of arbitration governance, are decisive for establishing the boundary of competence of a meta-organization (Santos and Eisenhardt 2005).
Fixing the Arbitration System.
By contrast, arbitrations between organizations that both have strong resources tend to be more balanced, as in the case of a company and a labor union that are trying to resolve a collective-bargaining agreement or two companies arguing over a possible patent infringement.
A spokeswoman for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which oversaw the arbitration, said the organization does not believe it has ever seen a situation like this.
But all the countries involved are parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration, an international organization that seeks the pacific settlement of international disputes, including those over territorial and maritime boundaries.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration, an international organization, ruled in 2009 that Heglig was outside the borders of the contested area of Abyei that lies between Sudan and South Sudan, and thus belonged to the government in Khartoum.
In 2009, the Permanent Court of Arbitration, an international organization, ruled that Heglig was outside the borders of the contested area of Abyei, which lies between Sudan and South Sudan, and therefore belonged to Sudan.
In Section A formal view on arbitration in meta-organizations we will present a formal model to target the specific aspects of the governance problem that meta-organizations face.
